SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2198

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, MARLI VANKUNG, JJ.
Ranglal Bhumij, S/o A. Bhumij - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam - Respondent
Criminal Appeal no. 399 of 2023
Decided On : 06-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B. Chakravarty, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. B. Bhuyan, Senior Counsel & Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam; Ms. R. Das, Advocate

Culpable homicide may be reduced to lesser charges under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC when death occurs due to injuries inflicted during a sudden fight without premeditation.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 323 - Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and hurt - Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for life imprisonment and 323 IPC for hurt, both sentences concurrent - Evidence revealed a sudden fight following a quarrel, leading to one fatal injury - Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC applicable, modifying conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC. (Paras 35 and 36)

(B) Criminal law - Nature of injury and intent - Death not the direct consequence of an earlier injury, but rather due to injuries sustained during a sudden fight, warranting evaluation under culpable homicide not amounting to murder. (Paras 25 and 33)

Facts of the case:
Appellant convicted for killing Kanu Karmakar during a fight that ensued when the deceased and others confronted him regarding an earlier assault. Victim died two days after incident due to injuries sustained; trial court’s conviction heavily based on witness testimonies. (Paras 1-7)

Findings of Court:
Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside; found guilty under Section 304 IPC, with life sentence and fines maintained. (Paras 36 and 37)

Issues: Whether the act amounted to murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder, and whether the circumstances justified reducing the conviction. (Paras 27 and 35)

Ratio Decidendi: Court identified the applicability of Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC, ruling that the incident stemmed from a sudden fight without premeditation, leading to culpable homicide, not murder. Court emphasized intention behind the injury rather than the delayed death of the victim. (Paras 26-35)

Result: Appeal allowed to the extent of modifying the conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case and incidents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 9 , 10)
3. court's analysis of witness testimonies. (Para 11 , 12 , 20 , 24)
4. discussion on culpable homicide and exceptions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
5. final order and directions regarding compensation. (Para 36 , 39 , 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

[Manish Choudhury, J]

1. The instant criminal appeal under Section 374 , Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC] is directed against a Judgment & Order dated 20.09.2014 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia [‘the Trial Court’, for short] in Sessions Case no. 172[T] of 2012. By the Judgment & Order dated 20.09.2014, the Trial Court has convicted the accused-appellant on two counts, that is, for committing offences under Section 302 , Indian Penal Code [ IPC ] and Section 323 , . For the offence under , , the accused-appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another six months. For the offence under , , the accused-appellant has been imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. The sentences are ordered to run concurrently.

2. The investigation was set into motion on institution of a First Information Report [FIR] by the informant, Smti. Sefali Rajbor [P.W.1] on 14.08.2011 before the Officer In-Charge, Phillobari Police Station. In the FIR, the informant who was a resident of Krishnapur, had inter alia alleged that on 12.08.2011, her neighbour, Ranglal Bhumij, that is, the accused-appellant started quarrelling with them and assaulted them without a cause. The informant further stated that the accused-appellant assaulted her in the evening and as a result, her left hand was broken. The informant further alleged that Lalu Karmakar and her younger brother, Kanu Karmakar were also assaulted. Lalu Karmakar sustained injury on his hand. Her brother, Kanu Karmakar was assaulted when he came to disengage them from the scuffle and due to the injury sustained, Kanu Karmakar passed away previous night.

3. On receipt of the FIR, the Officer In-Charge, Phillobari Police Station registered it as Phillobari Police Station Case no. 25/2011 under Sections 325 /302, IPC [corresponding G.R. Case no. 1021/2011] and decided to take up the investigation of the case himself.

4. During the course of the investigation, the Investigating Officer [I.O.] conducted inquest proceedings on the deadbody of the deceased, Kanu Karmakar in the house of Birgu Rajbhar [P.W.7] on 14.08.2011. The I.O. also sent the informant, P.W.1 who claimed to have sustained injury in the incident, to Phillobari State Dispensary on 14.08.2011 for medical examination and P.W.1 was examined by P.W.9, the Medical & Health Officer, Phillobari State Dispensary on 14.08.2011. After the inquest proceedings, the deadbody of Kanu Karmakar was sent to Tinsukia Civil Hospital for post- mortem examination. The I.O. drew up a Sketch Map of the place of occurrence [Ext.-5] and recorded the statements of the witnesses under section 161, CrPC. After collecting the Post-Mortem Examination [PME] Report and completing the investigation, the I.O. submitted a charge-sheet under Section 173 [2], CrPC vide Charge-Sheet no. 02/2012 on 31.01.2012 finding a prima facie case against the accused-appellant for committing the offences under Sections 325 /302, IPC .

5. On submission of the Charge-Sheet, the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tinsukia issued process for appearance of the accused-appellant. On receipt of the process, the accused-appellant who was earlier granted bail on 18.01.2012, appeared before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tinsukia on 18.07.2012. On that day, the copies were furnished to the accused-appellant in compliance of the provisions of Section 207 , CrPC. Finding the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top