KAKHETO SEMA
Maryangla – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KAKHETO SEMA, J.
1. Heard Mr. I. Imti Longchar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Moa Imchen, learned Sr. Government Advocate for the State respondents.
2. The limited issued raised in the writ petition is for retrospective regularisation of the service of the petitioner with regular scale of pay.
3. The facts of the case in brief are as under:
(ii) That the petitioner on 16/02/2000 submitted the representation to the Director of Printing Press, Nagaland, Kohima for regularisation of service and for the scale of pay as paid to the regular sweeper.
(iii) That vide order No. NGP/EST/1/90 dated 29/02/2000, the petitioner was temporarily appointed as the sweeper in the Directorate of Printing & Stationary, Nagaland, Kohima, in the scale of pay of Rs. 6
Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology & Another vs. Manoj K. Mohanty
Secretary, State of Karnataka & Others vs. Umadevi & Others
State of Punjab & Another vs. Surjit Singh & Others
State of Rajasthan & Others vs. Daya Lal & Others
Surinder Singh & Another vs. Engineer-in-Chief CPWD & Others
Uttar Pradesh Land Development Cooperation & Another vs. Mohd. Khursheed Anwar & Another
Uttaranchal Forest Rangers’ Assn (Direct recruit) & Others vs. State of U.P. & Others
B. Sudharkar Rao & Others vs. U. Govinda Rao & Others
The court established that eligibility for regularization and pensionary benefits must be determined based on the criteria set forth in applicable regulations, and that such benefits cannot be claime....
The court does not have the power to direct regularization and/or absorption in service unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of the constitutional scheme. The petitioner fail....
The court ruled that employees employed for lengthy periods cannot be denied regularization of service, emphasizing principles of fairness and equality under the Constitution.
Regularization of service is the exclusive domain of the employer, and temporary and casual employees cannot seek regularization. Government orders come into effect from the date of issuance unless s....
The court affirmed that the principle of equal treatment in public employment must be upheld, requiring regularization for long-serving employees despite technical non-compliance with bureaucratic cr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to interpret beneficial legislation liberally to achieve the legislative intent and uphold the principle of equal pay for equal work.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.