ROBIN PHUKAN, BUDI HABUNG
State Of Nagaland – Appellant
Versus
Angphei Konyak, S/o Henka Konyak – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Robin Phukan, J.
Heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland for the appellants and Mr. Sentiyanger, learned Counsel for the sole respondent.
2. This intra-court appeal, under Chapter VA, Rule 2 of the Gauhati High Court Rules, is preferred by the State of Nagaland and two others, challenging the judgment and order dated 11.04.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge, in W.P.[C] No. 21/2021.
3. It to be noted here that vide judgment and order dated 11.04.2022, learned Single Judge has directed the appellants/respondents to regularize the service of the sole respondent, namely, Shri Angphei Konyak, within a period of 4 [four] months from the date of receipt of the order for pensionary benefits.
4. The background fact leading to filing of this petition is adumbrated herein below:-
Alembic Chemical Works Co. Ltd. vs. Workmen reported in AIR 1961 SC 647
Employees’ State Insurance Corporation vs. Union of India reported in (2022) 11 SCC 392
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in AIR 1974 SC 555
Lalappa Lingappa and Ors. vs. L.V. Textile Mills Ltd. reported in AIR 1981 SC 852
National Insurance Company Limited vs Pranay Sethi & Ors. reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680
State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)
State of Manipur & Ors. vs. KSH Ibobal Singh reported in 1997 2 GauLT 209
State of U.P. vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava reported in (2015) 1 SCC 347
State of Manipur and Ors. vs. KSH. Ibobal Singh reported in 1997(2) GauLT 209
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.