NELSON SAILO
K. Pawhnie S/o K. Rahmo – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NELSON SAILO, J.
1. Heard Mr. C Tlanthianghlima, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Addl. Advocate General, Mizoram for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Mr. C Zoramchhana, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 & 4 and Mr. B Lalramenga, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 6 & 8. None appears for respondent Nos. 5 & 7 despite notice.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is before this Court with the following prayer:
A. Ayyasami vs. A Paramasivam & Ors. (2016) 10 SCC 386
K. Ventakachalam vs. Swamickan & Anr. (1999) 4 SCC 526
Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183
S. Rukmini Madegowda vs. State Election Commission & Ors. 2022 SCC Online SC 1218
Union of India vs. Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr. (2002) 5 SCC 294
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.