SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 942

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Anil Verma, J.
Subhash Kumar Sojatia – Petitioner
Versus
Devilal Dhakad and others – Respondents
Election Petition No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 31-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ravindra Singh Chhabra, Mudit Maheshwar, Aman Arora
For the Respondent: Rohit Kumar Mangal, Sunil Verma, Anurodh Singh Gaud, Somesh Gobhuj

Headnote:(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 80, 81, 100(1)(b), 100(1)(d), 123(2), 123(3), 123(4) - Election petition challenging the election of a returned candidate on grounds of corrupt practices - Petitioner alleged non-disclosure of government dues and seeking votes on the basis of caste - Election result declared in favor of respondent with valid votes - Petitioner's burden to prove corrupt practices not met, as discrepancies in evidence raised doubts - Issues of election fraud, public speech, and improper acceptance of nomination discussed in court. (Paras 1-156)

(B) Disclosure of assets - Non-disclosure of minor dues not affecting election results - No credible evidence linking non-disclosure to voter influence established. (Paras 43-61)

(C) Corrupt practices - Mere allegations without corroborative evidence deemed inadequate - No verifiable link between candidate's actions and election malpractices established. (Paras 102-130)

Findings of Court:
Petitioner failed to prove allegations of corrupt practices beyond reasonable doubt; election petition dismissed.

Issues: Validity of candidacy, adequacy of disclosures made, and allegations of corrupt practices within electoral conduct.

Ratio Decidendi: To annul election results based on corrupt practices, petitioner must establish evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Result: Election petition dismissed; no costs.)

Table of Content
1. challenge to legislative election based on allegations against a candidate. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations of corrupt practices for election candidacy. (Para 3 , 6)
3. non-disclosure of dues and sought votes based on community. (Para 4 , 5)
4. response to allegations and effort to prove innocence. (Para 10 , 11)
5. burden of proof in election disputes. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 31)
6. conclusive evidence led to dismissal of the election petition. (Para 73 , 100 , 154 , 155)

ORDER :

Anil Verma, J.

This Election Petition under section 80, 81, 100(1)(b), 100(1)(d) read with section 123(2), 123(3) and 123(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short “RP Act”) has been filed by the petitioner/defeated candidate with the symbol of hand (Panja) calling in question the election of respondent No. 1 Devilal Dhakad, a returned candidate with the symbol of lotus (Kamal) from the Constituency No. 227, Garoth, District Mandsaur in the General Election for M. P. State Legislative Assembly held in November, 2018 and seeking relief to set aside the election of the respondent No. 1 and for declaring himself as an elected candidate.

2. It is not disputed that in the aforesaid election the candidate including the respondent No. 1 Devilal Dhakad, an official candidate of Bhartiya Janata Party and petitioner Subhash Kumar Sojatia, an official candidate of Indian National Congress, are in the fray. The polling was held on 28-11-2018, counting of votes took place on 11-2-2018 and on the same day result was declared, in which the respondent No. 1 Devilal Dhakad secured 75946 valid votes and he was declared returned candidate. His nearest contestant/petitioner Subhash Kumar Sojatia secured 73838 votes. The respondent No. 1 defeated the petitioner by margin of 2108 votes.

3. The petitioner Subhash Kumar Sojatia has challenged the election of respondent No. 1 alleging that the respondent No. 1 has filed his nomination Form No. 26 along with the affidavit on 9-11-2018 and in para 8 of his affidavit he has categorically mentioned that there are no government dues against him. The respondent No. 1 has not paid dues of diversion taxes of Rs. 588/- for the period of 2011-12 to 2017-18 for his property situated at village Bhanpura, Patwari Halka No. 10, Survey No. 1694, which is owned and possessed by him. This fact has been admitted by the respondent No. 1 in para 7 of the affidavit. Certified copy of response of Tehsildar, Bhanpura revealing outstanding diversion dues of respondent No. 1 received under the provisions of M. P. Lok Sewaon Ke Pradan Ki Guarantee Adhiniyam, 2010 and the receipt dated 19-12-2018 issued by the Sanchalak, Lok Seva Kendra, Bhanpura are filed as Annexure P/7. Respondent No. 1 has taken a house at Survey No. 1362, Bhanpura on rent at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month from the State of M. P. and also obtained electricity connection of the said house, respondent No. 1 has applied for a No Objection Certificate to the Tehsildar. The respondent No. 1 has deliberately suppressed all these material facts in his affidavit. Electricity bill dated 31-12-2018 of the aforesaid leased premises bearing mobile number of the respondent No. 1 would indicate that the said premise is in the possession of the respondent No. 1, whereas the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 1 categorically states that he has not taken any government property on lease, thereby false information has been given in the said affidavit.

4. Petitioner further contended that the respondent No. 1 has not paid the rent dues of government accommodation till 30-11-2018 amounting to Rs. 29,700/-. The copy of the electricity bill dated 31-12-2018 and the List of Defaulters dated 18-12-2018 issued by the Tehsildar, Bhanpura has been filed. Demand notice issued by the Tehsildar, Bhanpura to respondent No. 1 demanding payment of Rs. 21,000/- on or before 25-

                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                      1
                      2
                      3
                      4
                      5
                      6
                      7
                      8
                      9
                      10
                      11
                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                      supreme today icon
                      logo-black

                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                      Please visit our Training & Support
                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                      qr

                      Scan Me!

                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                      whatsapp-icon Back to top