IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Rashidul Islam Mandal, Son Of Idrish Ali Mondal – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Principal Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department To The Govt. Of Assam and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.904 Of 2024, WP(C) No.955 Of 2024
Decided On : 30-09-2024
Regulation - Medical Education - Medical Council of India Regulations - The court interpreted the Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, emphasizing that no provision existed to debar students from examinations after 9 years, leading to the quashing of the notice against the petitioners.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, pursuing their MBBS at Gauhati Medical College, were debarred from upcoming examinations due to not completing their course within 9 years, as per a notice referencing a non-existent regulation from 2012.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the notice was arbitrary and illegal, as the applicable regulations did not impose a 9-year limit for the petitioners, who were governed by the 1997 regulations.
Issues: Whether the notice debarring the petitioners from appearing in the MBBS examination was valid under the applicable regulations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the 1997 regulations did not provide for debarring students based on a 9-year completion rule, thus the notice was invalid.
Result: The impugned notice was quashed, allowing the petitioners to appear in the MBBS examination.
JUDGMENT :
(Robin Phukan, J.) :
Heard Mr. R. Karim, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Also heard Mr. D.K. Baidya, learned Standing counsel for the respondent No. 6.
2. As the issue involved in WP(C) No. 904/2024 and WP(C) No. 955/2024, are same and as the respondents in both the petitions are same, and as agreed by learned Advocates of both the parties, it is proposed to dispose of these two petitions by this common judgment and order.
3. In these two writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, namely, Rashidul Islam Mandal in WP(C) No. 904/2024 and Tariq Hussain in WP(C) No. 955/2024, have put challenge the correctness or otherwise of the notice dated 12.02.2024, issued by the respondent No. 3, the Principal-cum-Chief Superintendent, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, debarring the petitioners from appearing in further MBBS Examination to be held on March, 2024.
4. The impugned notice dated 12.02.2024, is reproduced herein below for ready reference:
| “GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL:: GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE GUWAHATI-32. NOTICE 12/02/2024 As per the Medical Council of India, New Delhi Regulation on Graduate Medical Education, 2012 of Page No. 10 (Clause-7.8), A student shall not be allowed to graduate later than 9 years of joining first MBBS course. As such, as per the discussion in the meeting with HODs of Medicine, Surgery, Obst. & Gyne and Paediatric, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati held on 12/02/2024 the following students who could not completed their MBBS course within 9(nine) years from their date of joining in MBBS course at Gauhati Medical College are not allowed to appear in further MBBS Examination to be held on March, 2024. | ||
| Sl. No | Name of Students | Date of Admission |
| 01 | Rashidul Islam Mondal | 29/07/2013 |
| 02 | Tariq Hussain | 03/07/2014 |
| Prof. (Dr.) A. C. Baishya Principal, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati-32. Dated Guwahati, the 12th February, 2024 Memo No. MC/889/2017/P1-1/242-249” | ||
5. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petitions, are briefly stated as under:
It is the pleaded case of the petitioners that there is no Medical Council of India, New Delhi, Regulation on Graduate Medical Education, 2012 and the same ought to have been the Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, which was amended on 04.11.2019, and the said Regulation governs with respect to the batches of students admitted in MBBS course until the academic year 2018-19. Now, the said amended Regulation provides that a student shall not be allowed to graduate later than 9 years of joining his MBBS course, and since both the petitioners have failed to graduate after completion of 9 years, they are not entitled to appear in further examination to be held in March, 2024.”
6. Being aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing the present two
The court established that the Medical Council of India Regulations of 1997 did not impose a 9-year limit for MBBS course completion, rendering the notice invalid.
As per Clause 3 of the Scheme, which deals with qualifying criteria, the medical college/institution shall qualify to apply for increasing the number of admission in MBBS/PG Diploma/Degree/Higher Spe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of upholding academic standards and not interfering in academic discipline, as emphasized by legal precedents cited by the court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.