SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1326

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Rashidul Islam Mandal, Son Of Idrish Ali Mondal – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Principal Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department To The Govt. Of Assam and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.904 Of 2024, WP(C) No.955 Of 2024
Decided On : 30-09-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: MR. S.K. DAS, MR D. BARMAN, MR R. KARIM.
For the Respondents: Mr. B. Gogoi, Mr. D.K. Baidya.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the Medical Council of India Regulations of 1997 did not impose a 9-year limit for MBBS course completion, rendering the notice invalid.

Headnote:

Regulation - Medical Education - Medical Council of India Regulations - The court interpreted the Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, emphasizing that no provision existed to debar students from examinations after 9 years, leading to the quashing of the notice against the petitioners.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, pursuing their MBBS at Gauhati Medical College, were debarred from upcoming examinations due to not completing their course within 9 years, as per a notice referencing a non-existent regulation from 2012.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the notice was arbitrary and illegal, as the applicable regulations did not impose a 9-year limit for the petitioners, who were governed by the 1997 regulations.

Issues: Whether the notice debarring the petitioners from appearing in the MBBS examination was valid under the applicable regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the 1997 regulations did not provide for debarring students based on a 9-year completion rule, thus the notice was invalid.

Result: The impugned notice was quashed, allowing the petitioners to appear in the MBBS examination.

JUDGMENT :

(Robin Phukan, J.) :

Heard Mr. R. Karim, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Also heard Mr. D.K. Baidya, learned Standing counsel for the respondent No. 6.

2. As the issue involved in WP(C) No. 904/2024 and WP(C) No. 955/2024, are same and as the respondents in both the petitions are same, and as agreed by learned Advocates of both the parties, it is proposed to dispose of these two petitions by this common judgment and order.

3. In these two writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, namely, Rashidul Islam Mandal in WP(C) No. 904/2024 and Tariq Hussain in WP(C) No. 955/2024, have put challenge the correctness or otherwise of the notice dated 12.02.2024, issued by the respondent No. 3, the Principal-cum-Chief Superintendent, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, debarring the petitioners from appearing in further MBBS Examination to be held on March, 2024.

4. The impugned notice dated 12.02.2024, is reproduced herein below for ready reference:

“GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL:: GAUHATI MEDICAL COLLEGE

GUWAHATI-32.

NOTICE

12/02/2024

As per the Medical Council of India, New Delhi Regulation on Graduate Medical Education, 2012 of Page No. 10 (Clause-7.8), A student shall not be allowed to graduate later than 9 years of joining first MBBS course.

As such, as per the discussion in the meeting with HODs of Medicine, Surgery, Obst. & Gyne and Paediatric, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati held on 12/02/2024 the following students who could not completed their MBBS course within 9(nine) years from their date of joining in MBBS course at Gauhati Medical College are not allowed to appear in further MBBS Examination to be held on March, 2024.

Sl. No

Name of Students

Date of Admission

01

Rashidul Islam Mondal

29/07/2013

02

Tariq Hussain

03/07/2014

Prof. (Dr.) A. C. Baishya

Principal,

Gauhati Medical College,

Guwahati-32.

Dated Guwahati, the 12th February, 2024

Memo No. MC/889/2017/P1-1/242-249”

5. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petitions, are briefly stated as under:

    “The petitioners in these two petitions are pursuing MBBS course in the Gauhati Medical College and Hospital in the final year. The petitioner, namely, Rashidul Islam Mandal in WP(C) No. 904/2024, took admission on 29.07.2013, bearing Roll No. GAU 13365 and the petitioner, namely, Tariq Hussain in WP(C) No. 955/2024, took admission on 03.07.2014, bearing Roll No. GAU 09487, but, they could not complete their MBBS course since then. Thereafter on 12.02.2024, the respondent No. 3 had issued the impugned notice and thereby, debarred them from appearing in further MBBS Examination, to be held in March, 2024. In the said notice, the respondent No. 3 had made reference to the Medical Council of India, New Delhi, Regulation on Graduate Medical Education, 2012 of page No. 10 (Clause 7.8) and as per the said Regulation, a student shall not be allowed to graduate later than 9 years of joining first MBBS course.

It is the pleaded case of the petitioners that there is no Medical Council of India, New Delhi, Regulation on Graduate Medical Education, 2012 and the same ought to have been the Medical Council of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, which was amended on 04.11.2019, and the said Regulation governs with respect to the batches of students admitted in MBBS course until the academic year 2018-19. Now, the said amended Regulation provides that a student shall not be allowed to graduate later than 9 years of joining his MBBS course, and since both the petitioners have failed to graduate after completion of 9 years, they are not entitled to appear in further examination to be held in March, 2024.”

6. Being aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing the present two

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top