MANISH CHOUDHURY, KAKHETO SEMA
Neilhoulie Seyie, Senior Inspector of Supply, Department of Food and Civil Supplies – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manish Choudhury, J.
This intra - court appeal is presented against a Judgment and Order dated 21.10.2022 passed by a learned Single Judge in a writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 124/2019. It may be mentioned that by the Judgment and Order dated 21.10.2022, the learned Single Judge has disposed of two writ petitions, W.P.[C] no. 62/2019 and W.P.[C] no. 124/2019, by dismissing both of them. The writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 62/2019 was preferred by two writ petitioners viz. [i] Moanungsang; and [ii] Allen Imchen wherein the present appellant no. 1, Neilhoulie Seyie was impleaded as party-respondent no. 9. On the other hand, the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 124/2019 was preferred by the present two appellants as the writ petitioners viz. [i] Neilhoulie Seyie [A-1]; and [ii] Vihinu John [A-2] wherein the two writ petitioners in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 62/2019 were impleaded as party-respondent no. 3 and party-respondent no. 4 respectively and they are also impleaded in this intra - court appeal as party-respondent no. 3 [R-3] and party-respondent no. 4 [R-4] respectively.
2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the dismissal of their writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 124/2019 where the pr
G.S. Lamba and others vs. Union of India and others
Pawan Pratap Singh and others vs. Reevan Singh and others
State of Uttar Pradesh and others vs. Ashok Kumar Srivastava and another
Seniority between direct recruits and promotees must follow the quota-rota rule under statutory provisions when applicable, regardless of past non-implementation, ensuring fairness in the same recrui....
The court affirmed the application of the quota-rota rule for determining inter se seniority between promotees and direct recruits, emphasizing its necessity for fairness in service.
The seniority list was not prepared in accordance with the rules and the petitioners' objections were not considered.
Seniority for government employees must be determined from the date of appointment, not the initiation of recruitment, as upheld in relevant Supreme Court decisions.
The court reaffirmed that temporary or ad-hoc promotions do not confer seniority rights, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory rules for public service appointments.
Seniority – Inter-se seniority between promotees and direct appointees – As far as posts of Income Tax Inspectors are concerned, principle of rota and quota or rotation of quota will apply.
Seniority in service is a statutory right determined by established merit lists, with waiting list candidates lacking rights to precedence over those appointed from the main list.
Settled seniority cannot be retrospectively disturbed by review DPCs switching to post-based roster; vacancy-based DoPT methodology prevails over unamended RRs; protect pre-2015 promotee seniority an....
The court affirmed the validity of the merger of Senior Supply Inspectors with Area Rationing Officers effective from 30.06.2011, ruling that executive orders cannot override statutory rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.