ROBIN PHUKAN
AADHAR, (A PARTNERSHIP FIRM), REP. BY ITS PARTNER SMTI PURNASHREE DAS, W/O. SRI JYOTI PRAKASH DAS – Appellant
Versus
AJIT DEB, S/O. LATE KAMADA RANJAN DEB – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Robin Phukan, J.)
Heard Mr. B.K. Jain, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. B.D. Deka, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. In this appeal, under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the C.P.C., the appellant has put to challenge the correctness or otherwise of the Judgment dated 01.02.2024, and the Decree dated 07.02.2024, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No. 3, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, in Title Suit No. 413/2022.
3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned Judgment dated 01.02.2024, and Decree dated 07.02.2024, the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No. 3, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati has decreed the suit of the plaintiff on admission.
Background Facts:-
4. The background facts, leading to filing of the present appeal, are adumbrated herein below:-
Karan Kapoor vs. Madhuri Kumar
Hari Steel and General Industries Limited vs. Daljit Singh and Others
Uttam Singh Duggal and Company Limited vs. United Bank of India and Others
B. Santoshamma and Another vs. D. Sarala and Another
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Sahaswan, District Badaun vs. Bipin Kumar and Another
Raveesh Chand Jain vs. Raj Rani Jain
Jeevan Diesels and Electricals vs. Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) and Another
S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj reported in (2015) 9 SCC 287
The court affirmed that a judgment on admission under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC is valid when unqualified admissions exist, despite disputes over additional costs not included in the original agreement.
The appellate court must respect trial court findings unless clear errors exist, particularly regarding the existence and terms of contractual agreements and the parties' readiness to perform.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the proper procedure for admitting additional evidence and considering subsequent events that may impact the validit....
Discretion in granting specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act requires sound judicial reasoning, considering hardship and fairness to both parties, especially in the presenc....
A contract for sale is enforceable where there is evidence of readiness to pay the balance amount, and claims of fraud must be substantiated to invalidate the agreement.
A decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC requires clear, unconditional admissions of fact, which were absent in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.