HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.
Smt.Nirmala Tanwani W/o Shri Om Prakash Tanwani - Appellant
Versus
Sunil Chandra Jeevanmal, S/o P.E. Jeevanmal - Respondent
FA No. 2 of 2007
Decided On : 22-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. key facts of the case and agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's denial of allegations and defenses. (Para 4 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.
1. This is defendant’s first appeal filed under Section 96 of the C.P.C. challenging the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2006 passed by the learned 11th Additional District Judge, Raipur (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 90-A/2004 by which the learned trial Court allowed the suit filed by the plaintiff and directed the defendant to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff.
2. The parties are referred to as described in the civil suit before the learned trial Court.
3. The brief facts as reflected from the plaint’s averments are that:-
3.A)The plaintiff filed the civil suit for specific performance of the contract in respect of property namely Rice Mill known as Gurudev Rice Mill situated at Khasra No. 360/105 Area 1.54 Acre at village Tulsi, Bhatapara (hereinafter referred to as ‘the suit property’), agreement was executed on 20.03.2001 contending that the defendant owns the suit property and she has executed an agreement with the plaintiff on 20-3-2001 to sell the said rice mill along with land, house, pump, boiler and other complete equipment of the rice mill for sale consideration of Rupees five lakh rupees. It is also the case of the plaintiff that on 20-3-2001 i.e the date of execution of the agreement, the defendant received Rs 50,000/- from the plaintiff as advance amount out of the sale consideration of Rs 5,00,000/- through cheque and the defendant agreed to execute a registered sale deed of the entire rice mill in favour of the plaintiff by 15-7-2001. The plaintiff has also pleaded that he has paid the entire sale consideration on 22.03.2001 and a receipt of the same was also signed by the defendant. It has also been contended that if the plaintiff does not execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff by 15-7-2001, then the plaintiff will have the right to get it registered from the court.
3.B)It has been further contended that since the defendant has received the entire sale consideration of the suit property from the plaintiff she has handed over the original sale deed related to the land and also handed over the possession to the plaintiff. It has also been pleaded that the plaintiff was always ready and willing to execute the sale deed within the stipulated time period and the amount of the prescribed stamp duty was ready with the plaintiff. As such, the plaintiff contacted the defendant to register the sale deed before 15-7-2001, for which the defendant asked for time till July, 2002. Since the plaintiff had already paid the entire sale consideration and had also received possession of the rice mill, the plaintiff accepted the verbal request of the defendant. After this, the plaintiff continuously kept in touch with the defendant through his father, his hospital staff and himself and kept asking for registration of the sale deed, but the defendant did not show any interest in registering the sale deed and kept postponing it.
3.C)The plaintiff's further case is that in July 2002, the plaintiff went with his father and contacted the defendant and asked her to register the sale deed of the sold rice mill, but the defendant kept procrastinating for registration of the sale deed. Meanwhile, the plaintiff came to know that the defendant is trying to sell the rice mill to someone else, therefore, the plaintiff, through her advocate, published a general notice in the daily newspaper ‘Dainik Bhaskar’on 5-6-2002.
3.D)The plaintiff's further case is that the plaintiff through his advocate sent a registered notice dated 30-12-2002 to the defendant to the effect that the plaintiff is ready for registration of the sale deed and also mentioned in the notice about fixing the date for appearance of the plaintiff before the Registrar for registration of the sale deed which should be 7 days in advance, so that the plaintiff pays the necessary stamp duty, gets the sale
A.R. Madana Gopal and Others vs. Ramnath Publicvations Private Ltd.
P. Ramasubbamma vs. V. Vijayaalakshmi and Others
Motilal Jain vs. Ramdasi Devi and Others
Discretion in granting specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act requires sound judicial reasoning, considering hardship and fairness to both parties, especially in the presenc....
The grant of specific performance requires the plaintiff to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract and the court's discretion is governed by principles of equity and justi....
The court's discretion to grant specific performance is not arbitrary; it must consider unforeseen hardship to the defendant at the time of contract execution, not merely subsequent changes in circum....
The subsequent rise in price and the defendant's resistance were not valid grounds to deny the relief of specific performance. The trial court rightly exercised its discretion in granting the relief ....
Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 mandates readiness and willingness on the part of the plaintiff seeking specific performance and the plaintiff has to prove the same.
The court clarified that under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, discretion to deny specific performance must be based on clear evidence of hardship, which was not presented by the defendants.
Specific performance can be granted when the buyer has made substantial payments and the seller's refusal to execute the sale deed is unjustified, even if specific issues on readiness and willingness....
The court emphasized that specific performance is discretionary and must consider the fairness of the transaction and the conduct of the parties involved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.