Rochhara Chhangte vs State of Mizoram - 2024 Supreme(Gau) 1376

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1376

NELSON SAILO
Rochhara Chhangte – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.R. Malhotra.

JUDGMENT :

NELSON SAILO, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Addl. Advocate General for the respondents.

2. By filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:

“In the premises it is most humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records and issue rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the impugned Pay Slip dated 19/8/2022 (Annexure-4) reducing the basic pay of the Petitioner from Rs.57,400/- p.m. to Rs.55,200/- p.m. alongwith the impugned Letter No. G.12014/14/2016FIN(PRU) dt.17/2/2022 (Annexure-6), impugned Letter No. G.12014/14/2016-FIN(PRU) dt.9/3/2022 (Annexure-8) and the impugned Letter No. G.12014/14/2016-FIN(PRU) dt.13/4/2022 (Annexure-10) shall not be set aside and quashed and after hearing the parties be further pleased to make the rule absolute by protecting the basic pay of Rs.57,400/- p.m. of the Petitioner in accordance with his Last Pay Certificate (Annexure-3) and directing the Respondents to re-fix the basic pay of the Petitioner on his promotion to the rank of Inspector on 9/5/2022 and to p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document