ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Bimal Chandra Saikia, S/O Lt. Thaneswar Saikia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arun Dev Choudhury, J.
1. Heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. SC Biswas, learned Special counsel for NF Railways.
2. The petitioner herein is a retired employee of NF Railways and has preferred the present criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. assailing a judgment dated 07.02.2011 passed by the learned Special Magistrate, 1st Class, Guwahati in CR case No. 91C/2008, whereby the petitioner was convicted under Section 145/146 of the Railways Act and he was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 10 days inasmuch as it was alleged that he was found in an intoxicated state while on duty. The further challenge is the appellate judgement dated 12.03.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup in Criminal Appeal No. 67/2011 preferred by the present petitioner, whereby the judgment passed by the learned trial court was upheld.
3. Mr. B Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already retired from service and he never indulged during office hours except on the alleged occasion and
Ved Prakash Vs. State of Haryana reported in 1981 (1) SCC 447
Sita Ram Paswan Vs. State of Bihar reported in AIR 2005 SC 3534
The court emphasized rehabilitation over punishment, granting probation to a first-time offender under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
The court emphasized the importance of considering probation for first-time offenders, prioritizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court established that discretion in sentencing should prioritize rehabilitation over punishment, especially for first-time offenders.
The court emphasized the importance of discretion in sentencing, particularly under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering the offender's background and the nature of the crime.
The court emphasized the rehabilitative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, asserting that first-time offenders should be considered for probation to promote reform rather than punishment.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 during sentencing, highlighting the need for discretion based on the nature of the offence and the offender's b....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the rehabilitative purpose of sentencing under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, especially for first-time offenders.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in sentencing, especially for first-time offenders, to promote rehabilitation over punishment.
The court emphasized the importance of discretion in sentencing, allowing probation for first-time offenders in non-heinous cases.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in sentencing, highlighting that sentencing should focus on reform rather than punishment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.