IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KARDAK ETE, J.
Mapikam Tega S/o Shri Jingliang Tega – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Crl. Pet No. 88 of 2023
Decided On : 20-11-2024
(A) Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 9, 39, 51(C) - Quashing of FIR - The petitioner sought to quash an FIR alleging poaching of wildlife, claiming it was filed by unauthorized persons and constituted a second FIR on the same facts. The court held that the FIR was permissible as it related to different incidents in different jurisdictions. (Paras 1, 7, 19)
(B) Second FIR - The court reiterated the principle that a second FIR is not maintainable unless the versions of the incidents are different, allowing for multiple FIRs in cases of differing accounts. (Paras 14, 15, 17)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of poaching wildlife, with allegations stemming from two separate FIRs regarding different incidents involving the same accused but in different jurisdictions.
Findings of Court:
The court found no grounds to quash the FIR, emphasizing the need for investigation into wildlife poaching allegations.
Issues: The main issues were the maintainability of the second FIR and the authority of the complainants under the Wildlife (Protection) Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the FIR was valid as it pertained to different incidents and emphasized the importance of protecting wildlife under the law.
Result: The criminal petition was rejected and dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
1. Heard Ms. M.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent.
2. This application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. 1973, is filed by the petitioner praying for quashing of the FIR, registered as Anini P.S. Case No. 04/2023, under Sections 9/39/51(C) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, against the petitioner.
3. The case, in brief, is that a written FIR has been lodged against the petitioner before the Officer-in Charge, Roing, Police Station, by one Er. Drone Linggi and Shri Chonga Linggi, the President and General Secretary of All Idu Mishmi Student’s Union (AIMSU) on 07.03.2012, inter alia, alleging that Shri Mapikam Tega (petitioner herein), and his accomplice Md. Jakir Hussain are partners and hunters by profession, engaged in hunting and killing of Kasturi (Musk Dear), Tiger and Elephant for many years. During the raid, Shri Mapikam Tega had jumped from the vehicle and escaped the arrest, thereafter, he has lodged an FIR in Tezu, Police Station, stating that his vehicle bearing registration No. AS-23 V2160 was stolen, whereas, as per the information, it is his second hand personal car and just to mislead the police department, the said FIR has been lodged by the accused. He had also threatened his accomplice to keep mum promising that he would get him out of the jail. Accordingly, a zero FIR was registered at Roing P.S. vide Roing P.S. Case No. 00/2023, under Sections 9/39/51(C) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, on 09.03.2023 at 1700 hrs. and forwarded to Anini Police Station. On receipt of zero FIR, the case has been converted into regular case vide Anini P.S. Case No. 04/2023, Under Sections 9/39/51(C) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
4. It is contended that the complaint under Section 55 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, has also been lodged before the Sub-Divisional-Judicial Magistrate, Sadiya, Chapakhowa, Assam on 25.02.2023, by one Shri Churamoni Gajurel, Forest Range Officer, Sadiya Range Chapakhowa, which is extracted as under:
5. The aforesaid complaint was in pursuance to the Preliminary Offence Report and forwarding of accused against Offence report No. SD/15 of 2022-2023 dated 24.02.2023. In the said case, one accused person, namely, Md. Jakir Hussain, was arrested under Section 9/49(B)/52 punishable under Section 51(1-C) of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, read with Wildlife Protection (Assam Amendment) Act, 2009.
6. The petitioner has filed an application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail in Anini P.S. Case No. 04/2023, Under Sections 9/39/51(C) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, however, same has been rejected vide order 04.04.2023, by the learned Sessions Judge, Tezu, on the ground that Tiger carcasses were found in the vehicle of the accused and prima facie puts the accused responsible for such possession in connection with Anini P.S. Case No. 04/2023 under Sections 4/39/51(C) of Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. In C.R. (Forest) Case No. 02/2023 under Sec
Shivshankar Singh vs. State of Bihar & Anr. (2012) 1 SCC 130
The court ruled that a second FIR is permissible if it pertains to different incidents, emphasizing the need for wildlife protection under the law.
A second FIR for the same incident is impermissible under law unless it pertains to a different cognizable offence or occurrence.
FIR quashed under Section 528 BNSS as counter-blast to petitioner's prior complaint alleging outraging modesty, per Bhajan Lal Category 7, due to unexplained six-day delay and mala fide intent amid l....
The principle of non-registration of two FIRs for the same offence and against the same accused persons is based on the principle akin to double jeopardy, rule of fair investigation, and to prevent a....
A second FIR is permissible if it presents a different version of the same incident, allowing for new discoveries to be considered.
Multiple FIRs arising from distinct allegations are permissible under the law, and quashing is not warranted if separate offences are disclosed.
The court held that an FIR alleging cognizable offences cannot be quashed merely based on claims of disability or false implication; the truth of allegations is to be assessed at trial.
Subsequent FIRs may be permissible if they relate to distinct incidents or reveal new findings, even if arising from the same transaction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.