Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH
Reeta Hingmang – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing petition claims malicious counterblast fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. investigation uncovers altercation, land dispute, cctv evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. bhajan lal categories guide section 482 quashing powers. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 4. inherent powers exercised sparingly, prima facie assessment only. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. delay and admissions prove retaliatory abuse of process. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. fir and proceedings quashed as counterblast. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Petitioner Reeta Hingmang has filed the present petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing of FIR No.93 of 2024, dated 27.05.2024, (hereinafter referred to as the FIR, in question) registered, under Sections 341, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC’), with Police Station Shimla West, District Shimla, H.P., as well as, the proceedings resultant thereto.
2. According to the petitioner, she had lodged FIR No.87 of 2024, dated 22.05.2024, against respondent No.2, qua his alleged act of misbehaviour,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
