SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 68

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Chandra Vir S/O Uday Singh – Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau, Guwahati – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: N. ANAND
For the Respondent: S.C. KEYAL

JUDGMENT :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

1. These two applications are preferred by the accused-petitioners viz. (i) Chandra Vir (the petitioner in B.A. No. 1564/2024) and (ii) Rajeev Upadhay @ Rajeev Upadhayay (the petitioner in B.A. No. 1868/2024); under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’ and/or ‘the Code’ for short), seeking their release on bail in connection with NDPS Case No. 89 of 2020, arising out of NCB Crime Case No. 08 of 2020, registered for offences under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) and Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, the trial of which is presently pending before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 3 (FTC), Kamrup (Metro) at Guwahati (‘the Special Court’ for short) in the form of NDPS Case No. 89 of 2020.

2. As both the applications have arisen out of the same case, NDPS Case No. 89 of 2020 read with NCB Crime Case No. 08 of 2020 and the learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the two petitioners are similarly situated, both the bail applications are taken up together for consideration, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties.

3. The petitioner, Rajeev Upadha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top