Nyato Dabu Mengnia vs Gyodik Pute Tikli

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Duge Soki, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Domo Boje, learned Addl. P.P.

Table of Content
1. overview of facts regarding ancestral property dispute (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. arguments relating to delay in filing appeal and prejudice faced (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. respondents' claims and historical context of land ownership (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. analysis of procedural issues concerning limitation act (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 21)
5. analysis of the limitation act's application. (Para 19)
6. judicial emphasis on substantial justice over technicalities (Para 25 , 28)
7. final decision on condoning delay and cost implications (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT :

Susmita Phukan Khaund, J.

Heard Mr. Duge Soki, learned counsel for the appellant and also heard Mr. Domo Boje, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The substantial questions of law formulated in this appeal are:

2) Whether the amended provisions of Section 15 of the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Courts Act , 2021 has an application in the present case."

3. The aforementioned substantial questions of