SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 748

P. NAVEEN RAO, NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
M. Sunitha Yadamma – Appellant
Versus
M. Ramulamma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Krishna Mohan Sikharam, Advocate, D.Prakash Reddy, Advocate, B.Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA J. - Heard Sri Krishna Mohan Sikharam, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri D. Prakash Reddy, learned senior counsel represented Sri B. Rajeshwar Rao, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree in O.S.No.507 of 2018 dtd. 5/3/2018 on the file of Court of XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, the appellant filed this appeal suit.

3. The plaintiffs are the grandchildren of Late Laxmiah and Late Pentiah, who were both pattedars of the agricultural land in question. In 1970, Late Pentiah sold his share in the land to Late Laxmiah, who then became the absolute owner of the entire property. The annual yield from the land was given to the plaintiffs' father, Late Ramchander, who was a government servant. Late Ramchander died, leaving behind the plaintiffs and the respondents as his legal heirs. The plaintiffs were minors at the time of his death, so they never interfered with the affairs of the property. The eldest son, Respondent No. 10, was looking after the property and is currently in occupation of it. On January 15, 2008, the plaintiffs demanded a partition of the property from their mother,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top