P. NAVEEN RAO, NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
M. Sunitha Yadamma – Appellant
Versus
M. Ramulamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA J. - Heard Sri Krishna Mohan Sikharam, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri D. Prakash Reddy, learned senior counsel represented Sri B. Rajeshwar Rao, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree in O.S.No.507 of 2018 dtd. 5/3/2018 on the file of Court of XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, the appellant filed this appeal suit.
3. The plaintiffs are the grandchildren of Late Laxmiah and Late Pentiah, who were both pattedars of the agricultural land in question. In 1970, Late Pentiah sold his share in the land to Late Laxmiah, who then became the absolute owner of the entire property. The annual yield from the land was given to the plaintiffs' father, Late Ramchander, who was a government servant. Late Ramchander died, leaving behind the plaintiffs and the respondents as his legal heirs. The plaintiffs were minors at the time of his death, so they never interfered with the affairs of the property. The eldest son, Respondent No. 10, was looking after the property and is currently in occupation of it. On January 15, 2008, the plaintiffs demanded a partition of the property from their mother,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.