SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 182

THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
NELSON SAILO, J
Tsering S/o Late Dondup Tsering And 2 Ors. - Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India And 5 Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) 407 / 2023
Decided On : 12-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Binter Picha, Tao Tarin,Jumgam Jini
For the Respondent: Dugmar Kamduk, KeekeLoya,DSGI,Marto Kato,GA (AP),SC(Land Management

IMPORTANT POINT
Petitioners are entitled to rental compensation for unauthorized occupation of land by the Indian Army from 1980 to 2021, to be assessed and disbursed by the Deputy Commissioner.

Headnote:

(A) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Sections 11(1) and 19 - Writ petition for rental compensation for unauthorized occupation of land by the Indian Army from 1980 to 2021 - Petitioners entitled to rental compensation for land occupied without authorization until acquisition - Court directed assessment of rental compensation and timely disbursement. (Paras 6 , 23 , 24 )

(B) Jurisdiction of Writ Court - Claim for rental compensation is of civil nature and requires adjudication before a competent Civil Court - Writ Court can direct assessment of compensation for unauthorized occupation. (Paras 13 , 22 )

Facts of the case:

Petitioners claimed compensation for land occupied by the Indian Army since 1980 without payment. After a previous writ petition, land acquisition was initiated, but rental compensation was not addressed. Petitioners sought assessment of rental compensation for the period of unauthorized occupation. (Paras 2 , 8 , 9 )

Findings of Court:

Petitioners are entitled to rental compensation for the unauthorized occupation of their land from 1980 to 2021. The Deputy Commissioner is directed to assess and compute this compensation. (Paras 22 , 23 )

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioners are entitled to rental compensation for unauthorized occupation and the proper forum for such a claim. (Paras 9 , 12 )

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the petitioners are entitled to rental compensation for unauthorized occupation, emphasizing that such claims can be assessed by the Deputy Commissioner despite being civil in nature. (Paras 22 , 23 )

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for assessment of rental compensation.

JUDGMENT :

NELSON SAILO, J.

Heard Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Loya, learned CGC for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4; Mr. D. Kamduk, learned Standing Counsel for the Land Management Department for the respondent No. 5 and Mr. N. Ratan, Additional Advocate General for respondent No. 6.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to process the evaluation of the rent from the year 1980 till the year 2021 for an area of land belonging to them measuring 481.41 acres located at LGG (Glanggroh), under Bobdir village in Kitpi Circle in the District of Tawang, which according to them was forcefully occupied by the Indian Army.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that they represent all the family members whose land has been occupied unauthorizedly by the Indian Army. According to them they have inherited their land from their ancestors and use it for cultivation purposes and for grazing cattle. While the petitioners were enjoying their land peacefully without any disturbance from any corner, the Indian Army in the year 1980 started entering into their land and later occupied the same without any permission from the petitioners. Although the petitioners raised objections against the occupation of their land, but they were told by the Army personnels that they would be only using certain plots of the land and that also for a few years, purely on a temporary basis. With such assurance, the petitioners had allowed them to use it for a few years, but since the occupation of the land became a continuous process, the petitioners submitted a representation before the Commander, 190 Mountain Brigade, LGG, Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh on 11.08.2010 requesting the payment of adequate compensation for occupation of their land. Despite such request, since no steps were taken by the Army personnel, the petitioner approached the Deputy Commissioner, Tawang and the Deputy Commissioner, vide letter dated 16.08.2011 wrote to the Commander, 190 Mountain Brigade and 40 Mountain Brigade, requesting them to take steps for land acquisition for the areas they have occupied in coordination with the Office of the Defense Estate Officer (DEO) in order to avoid further disputes with the villagers.

4. Accordingly, a joint survey for land acquisition at Lungro GG was th th carried out from 18 to 19 June, 2012, for a total area of 481.41 acres and the map of the surveyed land duly signed by the landowners, Gaon Burahs (GBs) and Circle Officer (CO), Kitpi Circle, were obtained and the same was forwarded to the Circle Officer (CO), Land Management, under the establishment of Deputy Commissioner, Tawang.

5. Thereafter, the Army authorities wrote to the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO), Tawang, informing the latter that a total of 481.41 acres of land was required to be acquired at LGG and that the land had been surveyed and NOC obtained from the landowners and forwarded to the Circle Officer (CO), Kitpi and also to the Deputy Commissioner's Office at Tawang on 10.08.2012. As such, forest clearance for the said area of land was required to the Army authorities to process the case further.

6. Thereafter, pursuant to the Government's Notification No. LR- 152/2010/1811, dated 14.03.2011, a physical verification of the entire project area of LGG (481.43 acres) was carried out by the members of the constituted Committee on 14.06.2014 to verify the extent of the community land, individual land and forest area to be acquired for the purpose of acquisition of the land and the constituted Committee recorded its findings for 481.43 acres of land, wherein, the private land with individual customary holding with forest cover was found to be 160.5 acres and without non-forest cover as 320.93 acres, thereby, totaling to 481.43 acres. Since, further steps was not taken for acquisition of the land, the petit


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top