SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 581

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Sanjay Dhar, J.
Nazir Ahmad Shah - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of J&K & Ors. - Respondent
OWP No.818 of 2016
Decided On : 30-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Hisham Saleem, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. D. C. Raina, Advocate General, with Mr. Sajad Ashraf, GA., Mr. Mohsin Qadiri, Sr. AAG, with Ms. Maha Majeed, Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI.

The petitioner is not entitled to occupational charges beyond the date of vacation by Security Forces, and claims for additional land are declined unless rent for underlying land is not considered.

Headnote:(A) No specific laws or sections were cited in the judgment.

(B) The court addressed the entitlement of the petitioner to occupational charges beyond a specified date, the actual area of land occupied, and the claim for rent of land underneath structures.

(C)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the order regarding occupation charges for land occupied by Security Forces from 27.11.2005 to 19.01.2015.

(D)

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is not entitled to rent beyond 14.04.2010, and the claim for land exceeding 20 kanals is declined. (E)

Issues: The main issues were the entitlement to charges beyond a specified date, the actual area of occupation, and the right to claim rent for land beneath structures. (F)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the property was vacated on 14.04.2010 and the petitioner failed to take possession; thus, the claim for rent beyond that date is not valid. (G)

Result: The writ petition is disposed of with specific directions regarding the claims for rent. (Paras 1, 9, 25)

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has challenged order No.2403 of 2015 dated 08.08.2015 to the extent of not granting occupation charges of the land belonging to the petitioner and respondent No.7 w.e.f. 15.04.2010 to 19.01.2015 as also to the extent of area of occupied land, which has been shown as 17 kanals 12 marlas instead of 25 kanals and 17½ marlas.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case which emanate from the pleadings of the parties are that the land comprised in Khasra Nos.2028/415, 2030/41, 2031/415, 2075/423, 2077/423, 2078/423, 2079/423, 2080/423, 2081/423, 413 and 414 in Estate Zainakote Tehsil Centre, Shalteng, Srinagar, along with structures raised thereon belonging to the petitioner and respondent No.7, came to be occupied by the Security Forces with effect from 27.11.2005. According to the petitioner, the total land that was occupied by the Security Forces is measuring 25 kanals and 17 marlas whereas stand of the official respondents is that only 20 kanals of land, out of the big chunk of land measuring 25 kanals and 17 marlas belonging to the petitioner and respondent No.7, was occupied by the Security Forces. There is also dispute as regard the date on which the Security Forces vacated the property in question and handed over the possession thereof to the owners. According to the petitioner, the property in question remained in occupation of the official respondents until 19.01.2015 when certificate of handing over/taking over was executed by the petitioner, whileas the official respondents claim that the Security Forces vacated the property on 14.04.2010 and it was due to the reasons attributable to the petitioner that he did not take over possession of the property until 19.01.2015, therefore, they are liable to pay occupation charges/rent only upto 14.04.2010.

3. There is yet another relevant fact which is required to be noticed. The structures raised on the land in question are alleged to have been raised by the son of the petitioner, namely, Masood Ahmad Shah, which is being disputed by respondent No.7. Said Shri Masood Ahmad Shah had filed a writ petition bearing OWP No.184/2010 seeking a direction upon the official respondents to make assessment of the structures raised on the aforesaid land and to release the rent in his favour. The said writ petition came to be disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in terms of order dated 03.07.2001 and it was provided that the rent deposited before the Registry on account of the occupational charges of these structures shall be released by the District Judge, Srinagar, after determining entitlement of the parties to receive the said amount. The area of land underneath these structures is stated to be 02 kanals 08 marlas.

4. The District Level Rent Assessment Committee in its meeting held on 20.01.2015 assessed the rent for the aforesaid land measuring 25 kanals and 17 marlas @Rs.14,538.50/ per month upto 15th February, 2008, in terms of SRO 325 dated 02.12.2005 and @Rs.72,690.20/ per month from 16th February, 2008, onwards in terms of SRO 104 dated 11.04.2008. So far as the structures existing on the land in question, which were in occupation of the Security Forces are concerned, the District Level Rent Assessment Committee, Srinagar, assessed the rent for the same @ Rs.32,618/ per month in favour of Shri Masood Ahmad Shah, the son of the petitioner.

5. Pursuant to the aforesaid assessments made by the District Level Rent Assessment Committees, the Director General of Police issued sanction order No.2403 of 2015 dated 08.08.2015, whereby sanction was accorded to the grant of rent @Rs32,618/per month for the structures with effect from 27.11.2005 to 14.04.2010 and for grant of rent for the land measuring 17 kanals and 12 marlas (excluding land measuring 02 kanals 08 marlas underneath the structures belonging to the petitioner and respondent No.7) @Rs.6750/ per kanal per annum with effect from 27.11.2005 to 15.02.2008 and @Rs.33,750/ per kanal per annum with effect f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top