THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ., N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Dr Netramoni Baruah And Ors S/o Jibon Chandra Baruah - Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam - Respondent
WA/49/2025
Decided On : 25-02-2025
(A) Assam Technical Education Service Rules, 1981 - Recruitment process for Guest/Part-Time Faculty - Appellants engaged as Guest/Part-Time Faculty in newly established Polytechnics challenged rejection of their claim for regularization - Court found that their engagement was temporary and did not confer rights for regular appointment. (Paras 3 , 19 , 56 )
(B) Legal principles on regularization - Temporary employees cannot claim regularization without fulfilling conditions set by Supreme Court in Uma Devi (3) - Continuous service under interim protection does not count towards regularization. (Paras 19 , 56 )
(C) Issues of recruitment process - Court addressed the validity of the recruitment process and the rights of the appellants in light of subsequent advertisements for regular posts. (Paras 19 , 56 )
(D) Findings of Court - The learned Single Judge's conclusions were well-reasoned, emphasizing that the appellants' engagement was a stop-gap arrangement and did not create a right to regularization. (Paras 19 , 56 )
(E) Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. P. K. Goswami, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. J.Goswami, learned counsel, and Mr. B. P. Borah, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellants. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department; and Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. P. Sarma, learned counsel; appearing on behalf of their respective respondents.
2. The appellants, herein, by way of instituting the present intra-Court appeal, have presented a challenge to a judgment & order, dated 28.01.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(c)8795/2019, rejecting the claim of the appellants for having the contractual appointment effected in their cases, regularized against the sanctioned posts so available.
3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issues arising in the present intra-Court appeal, is noticed, as under:
The Government on the establishment of 11(eleven) new Polytechnics in the State and consequent creation of posts in such newly created polytechnics; a decision was arrived at for filling up of the said posts, including the posts of Lecturers so created, by way of engaging qualified personnel as Guest/Part Time Faculty.
In view of the said decision so arrived at; the Director, Technical Education, Assam, issued an advertisement, dated 24.12.2016, inviting applications from candidates having the prescribed AICTE/UGC norms adopted by the Government of Assam for engagement as Guest/Part Time Faculty in the newly established 11(eleven) Polytechnics in the State, as spelt-out therein.
The said recruitment was required to be so made by way of evaluating the candidates through a walk-in-interview. The appellants, herein, being eligible, had submitted their respective applications for being considered for recruitment as Guest/Part-Time Faculty pursuant to the said advertisement, dated 24.12.2016. On conclusion of the said recruitment process, a select list was prepared and published vide Notice, dated 01.02.2017, by the Director, Technical Education, Assam.
In pursuance of selection of the appellants, herein, they were issued with individual engagement letters engaging them as Guest/Part-Time Faculty against various Departments.
In terms of the said engagement letter, dated 06.02.2017, the appellants, herein, were to report for joining in their respective institution on 01.04.2017. The engagement so effected, was stipulated to be initially for a period of 6 months from the date of reporting and may be renewed as per the requirement of the Department. It was further stipulated that the engagement so effected, shall not be claimed for regular appointment. Thereafter, the Government in the Higher Education Department, vide communication, dated 13.02.2017, conveyed its approval towards the engagement of Guest/Part Time Faculty in 11(eleven) newly established Polytechnics in the State from April, 2017, onwards, subject to the following conditions:
The appellants, herein, have projected that in terms of the engagement letters so issued to them, they had joined their respective services w.e.f. 01.04.2017. Pursuant to the joining of the appellants, herein, w.e.f. 01.04.2017, within a period of less than 2 months; on a requisition so made by the Higher Education Department; the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) issued an advertisement, dated 25.05.2017, inviting applications, amongst others, for filling up of 113 nos. of vacant posts of Lecturers(Technical) and 86 nos. of vacant posts of Lecturers(Non- Technical) in various Polytechnics of the State,
State of Punjab & ors. v. Jagjit Singh & ors.
State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi(3)
Temporary employees cannot claim regularization without meeting Supreme Court criteria, including continuous service without interim protection.
Temporary appointments do not create a vested right for regularization unless specific conditions, including a minimum service period without interim protection, are met.
Temporary employees lack a legal right to regularization unless appointed per relevant rules; participation in selection waives claims for regularization.
Temporary or irregular employees lack a legal right to permanent status unless appointed per relevant rules, as established in Uma Devi (3).
Long service on a contractual basis does not confer a legal right to regularization without a formal scheme in place, as established by Supreme Court precedents.
Employers must clearly specify the nature of appointments in job advertisements; failure to do so leads to regularization of initially contractual positions when recruitment processes are followed.
The court recognized the right of the State to appoint persons on temporary basis to meet its exigencies, and held that the failure of the ATTC to maintain the student to lecturer ratio and the petit....
Temporary or contractual employees lack legal entitlement to regularization unless appointed through lawful selection processes as established by precedent.
Temporary employees appointed via constitutional procedures are entitled to regularization, highlighting the need for compliance with recruitment mandates to ensure fairness and uphold employee right....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.