THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, J
Rahul Amin Reza Son Of Asaddar Ali And 15 Ors - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 4 Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) 8073 / 2019
Decided On : 07-02-2025
(A) Assam Technical Education Services Rules, 1981 - Advertisement dated 25.05.2017 - Petitioners, Guest/Part-Time Assistant Professors, challenged the advertisement and notifications for regular appointments, claiming absorption into sanctioned posts - Court found that petitioners were irregularly appointed and did not meet conditions for regularization as per Supreme Court precedents. (Paras 9 , 16 , 18 , 22 )
(B) Regularization - The Supreme Court in Uma Devi (3) established that temporary or irregular employees do not have a legal right to permanent status unless appointed per relevant rules. (Paras 16 , 20 )
(C) Equal Pay for Equal Work - The principle applies to all employees, regardless of their employment status. (Para 21 )
Facts of the case:
Petitioners were engaged as Guest/Part-Time Assistant Professors in Barak Valley Engineering College but challenged subsequent advertisements for regular appointments, arguing for absorption into sanctioned posts. (Paras 2 , 6 )
Findings of Court:
The petitioners' services cannot be regularized as they were appointed irregularly and did not fulfill the conditions set by the Supreme Court for regularization. (Paras 18 , 22 )
Issues: Whether the petitioners' services can be absorbed and the legality of the advertisements for regular appointments. (Para 6 )
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners' irregular appointment does not entitle them to regularization, and they should have participated in the selection process for regular posts. (Paras 16 , 22 )
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, J.
1. Heard Mr. K.P.Pathak, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M.Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.Gogoi, learned counsel for the Higher Education Department. Ms. P.Sharma, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. T.J.Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel for the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC).
2. The petitioners who are Guest/Part-Time Assistant Professors (Technical) in the Barak Valley Engineering College, have prayed for setting aside the Advertisement dated 25.05.2017 and the consequential notifications dated 25.09.2018, 08.10.2018, 30.09.2019 and 15.10.2019, by which applications were invited for regular appointment to the post of Assistant Professors (Technical) in the Barak Valley Engineering College, Karimganj. The petitioners ground of challenge is that they are currently working against sanctioned posts of Assistant Professors (Technical) in the said College and as such, their services as Guest/Part-Time Assistant Professors (Technical) should be absorbed.
3. The case of the petitioners is that pursuant to an Advertisement dated 24.12.2016, inviting applicants for engagement as Guest/Part-Time Faculty Members in the Barak Valley Engineering College, Karimganj, the petitioners took part in the selection process for filing up the vacant posts of Assistant Professor (Technical). The petitioners having been selected, a select list was submitted to the Higher Education Department, Government of Assam for their appointment. The Joint Secretary to the Government of Assam, Higher Education Department, thereafter issued letter dated 13.02.2017 to the Director of Technical Education, Assam, conveying the approval of the Government for appointment of Guest/Part-Time Assistant Professors in the Barak Valley st Engineering College, Karimganj from 1 April, 2017 onwards, subject to the following conditions:-
4. Subsequent to the above letter dated 13.02.2017, the petitioners were appointed as Guest/Part-Time Faculty Members in the month of February, 2017 w.e.f. 01.04.2017, vide their engagement letters, one of which is reproduced herein below as follows:
5. The respondents thereafter issued another advertisement dated 25.05.2017, for filling up the vacant posts of Assistant Professor (Technical) on regular basis.
6. The petitioners’ counsel submits that subsequent to the Advertisement dated 25.05.2017, the respondents issued Notifications dated 25.09.2018, 08.10.2018, 30.09.2019 and 15.10.2019, which provided the syllabus for the examination to be held for regular appointment to the post of Assistant Professor (Technical) and the marks to be awarded. However, in the above notifications, no weightage had been provided for the p
Temporary or irregular employees lack a legal right to permanent status unless appointed per relevant rules, as established in Uma Devi (3).
Temporary appointments do not create a vested right for regularization unless specific conditions, including a minimum service period without interim protection, are met.
Temporary employees lack a legal right to regularization unless appointed per relevant rules; participation in selection waives claims for regularization.
Temporary employees cannot claim regularization without meeting Supreme Court criteria, including continuous service without interim protection.
Long service on a contractual basis does not confer a legal right to regularization without a formal scheme in place, as established by Supreme Court precedents.
Temporary or contractual employees lack legal entitlement to regularization unless appointed through lawful selection processes as established by precedent.
Since there are no sanctioned posts on which any of these petitioners were appointed as irregular appointments, no such directions are warranted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Petitioners' service should have been regularized as they were engaged against sanctioned posts by following due process of selection and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.