THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ, N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Dr Biplab Singha S/o Mathura Singha - Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam - Respondent
WA 47/2025
Decided On : 25-02-2025
(A) Assam Technical Education Service Rules, 1981 - Recruitment process for Assistant Professors - Appellants challenged the rejection of their claim for regularization of their contractual appointment as Guest/Part-Time Faculty - The court found that their engagement was temporary and did not confer any right for regularization. (Paras 3 , 12 , 54 , 56 )
(B) Legal principles - The court emphasized that temporary appointments do not create a vested right for regularization unless specific conditions are met, including a minimum service period without interim protection. (Paras 40 , 54 )
(C) Facts of the case:
The appellants were engaged as Guest/Part-Time Faculty in Barak Valley Engineering College on a temporary basis, with no assurance of regularization. They were subsequently not considered for regular posts advertised by the Assam Public Service Commission. (Paras 3 , 4 , 12 )
(D) Findings of Court:
The court upheld the rejection of the appellants' claim for regularization, stating that their engagement was a stop-gap arrangement and did not meet the criteria for regularization under the applicable rules. (Paras 54 , 56 )
(E) Issues: The main issues included whether the appellants had a right to regularization and the validity of their temporary engagement. (Paras 12 , 54 )
(F) Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the appellants' temporary engagement did not confer any right to regularization, as they had not completed the requisite service period without interim protection. (Paras 40 , 54 )
(G) Result: The intra-Court appeal was dismissed. (Para 56 ) (H) Parties involved: Appellants vs. Respondents.
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. K. P. Pathak, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellants. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department; and Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. P. Sarma, learned counsel; appearing on behalf of their respective respondents.
2. The appellants, herein, by way of instituting the present intra-Court appeal, have presented a challenge to a judgment & order, dated 07.02.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(c)8073/2019, rejecting the claim of the appellants for having the contractual appointment effected in their cases, regularized against the sanctioned posts so available.
3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issues arising in the present intra-Court appeal, is noticed, as under:
On the establishment of the Barak Valley Engineering College, Karimganj; the Government vide a communication, dated 19.08.2009, created 50 posts in various categories including 37 posts of Lecturers[rechristened as Assistant Professors(Technical)]. The Government, thereafter, arrived at a decision to populate the post of Assistant Professors (Technical) with necessary staff by recruiting the same on contractual basis pending regular selection in the matter.
Accordingly, the Director, Technical Education, Assam, issued an advertisement, dated 24.12.2016, inviting applications from candidates having AICTE/UGC norms, as adopted by the Government of Assam, for engagement as Guest/Part-Time Faculty at the level of Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor in Barak Valley Engineering College, Karimganj.
The said recruitment was required to be so made by way of evaluating the candidates through a walk-in-interview. The appellants, herein, being eligible, had submitted their respective applications for being considered for recruitment as Guest/Part-Time Faculty pursuant to the said advertisement, dated 24.12.2016. On conclusion of the said recruitment process, a select list was prepared and published vide Notice, dated 01.02.2017, by the Director, Technical Education, Assam.
In pursuance of selection of the appellants, herein, they were issued with individual engagement letters engaging them as Guest/Part-Time Faculty in various Departments.
In terms of the said engagement letter, dated 08.02.2017, the appellants, herein, were to report for joining in their respective service on 01.04.2017, and further, the engagement so effected, was initially for a period of 6 months from the date of reporting, with provision for renewal as per the requirement of the Department. It was further stipulated that the engagement so effected, shall not be claimed for regular appointment.
Thereafter, the Government in the Higher Education Department, vide communication, dated 13.02.2017, conveyed its approval towards the engagement of Guest/Part Time Faculty in 11 new Polytechnics and Barak Valley Engineering College, Karimganj, from April, 2017, onwards, subject to the following conditions:
The appellants, herein, have projected that in terms of the engagement letters so issued to them, they had joined their respective service w.e.f. 01.04.2017. Pursuant to the joining of the appellants, herein, w.e.f. 01.04.2017, within a period of less than 2 months; on a requisition so made by the Higher Education Department; the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) issued an advertisement, dated 25.05.2017, inviting applications, amongst others, for filling up of 66(sixty six) posts of Assistant
State of Karnataka & ors. v. M. L. Kesari & ors.
State of Punjab & ors. v. Jagjit Singh & ors.
Temporary appointments do not create a vested right for regularization unless specific conditions, including a minimum service period without interim protection, are met.
Temporary employees cannot claim regularization without meeting Supreme Court criteria, including continuous service without interim protection.
Temporary or irregular employees lack a legal right to permanent status unless appointed per relevant rules, as established in Uma Devi (3).
Temporary employees lack a legal right to regularization unless appointed per relevant rules; participation in selection waives claims for regularization.
Long service on a contractual basis does not confer a legal right to regularization without a formal scheme in place, as established by Supreme Court precedents.
The court recognized the right of the State to appoint persons on temporary basis to meet its exigencies, and held that the failure of the ATTC to maintain the student to lecturer ratio and the petit....
Temporary employees appointed via constitutional procedures are entitled to regularization, highlighting the need for compliance with recruitment mandates to ensure fairness and uphold employee right....
Employers must clearly specify the nature of appointments in job advertisements; failure to do so leads to regularization of initially contractual positions when recruitment processes are followed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.