ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Durlabh Saikia S/o Lt. Purna Chandra Saikia – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.
1. Heard Mr. D Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P Borthakur, learned Addl. PP, Assam appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr. B Chowdhury, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
2. The present petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing the complaint petition registered as CR Case No.145 /2018, filed by the respondent No.2, alleging commission of offence under section 499/500 IPC . The further challenge is an order dated 20.01.2018, passed by the learned SDJM, No.2, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, whereby the cognizance of offence under section 500 IPC was taken.
3. Before dealing with the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, let this court first record the important statements made in the complaint which are to the following effect:
M/s Iveco Magirus Brandschutztechnik vs. Nirmal Kishore Bharatia
A defamation claim requires clear evidence that the statement harmed the complainant's reputation in the eyes of others, which was not established in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for an imputation to lower the moral or intellectual character of a person to constitute defamation under Section 499 IPC. Addition....
Intent to harm is necessary for establishing defamation under Indian Penal Code, and good faith expressions in a cooperative society's governance are protected from such allegations.
Defamation requires proof of a derogatory statement made publicly that lowers a person's reputation, which was not established in this case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of exception 8 to Section 499 of the IPC, emphasizing the need for good faith and lawful authority in making accusations and the....
Publication of true statements related to official proceedings cannot constitute defamation under IPC Section 500.
The court held that allegations of defamation and criminal intimidation lacked substance and failed to meet the necessary legal criteria under IPC Sections 500 and 506.
News alleging public servant corruption not defamatory if in good faith for public good, based on withheld information about public funds, with prior civil suit dismissal on same facts attaining fina....
The absence of specific allegations in a defamation complaint and unexplained delays in filing can warrant quashing of proceedings as abuses of process of law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.