THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
BUDI HABUNG
D. K. Thongdok S/o Lt. Wangdi Thongdok – Appellant
Versus
Tony Pertin S/o Lt. Gora Pertin – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BUDI HABUNG, J.
Heard Mr. Vijay Jamoh, learned counsel for the appellant. I have also heard Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and section 15 (2) of the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Courts Acts, 2021, against the Judgment and Decree dated 03.03.2023, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Capital Complex, Yupia, in Money Suit No. 84 of 2022. The learned court has imposed a cost of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) and directed the payment of Rs 61,00,000/-(Rupees Sixty one lakhs) only, with interest at 3.5% per month on the principal sum from January 2019 until date of filing of the suit, and interest at 6% per annum on the principal sum adjudged from the date of the suit to the date of decree, with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree to the date of the payment.
3. The brief fact of the case is that on 10.12.2019, the appellant executed a Promissory Note stating that he had borrowed an amount of Rs. 1,70,00,000/- (One Crore Seventy Lakhs) from th
Nutan Kumar Vs. IInd Additional District Judge, Banda
Himani Alloys Ltd Vs. Tata Steel Ltd
Gian Chand and Brothers and Anr Vs. Rattan Lal Alias Rattan Singh
Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. Santosh Kumari
Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. vs. United Bank of India 2000 (7) SCC 120
Karam Kapahi vs. Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust 2010 (4) SCC 753
Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Ltd. vs. Jasbir Singh Chadha 2010 (6) SCC 601
Gian Chand and Brothers and Anr Vs. Rattan Lal Alias Rattan Singh reported in (2013) 2 SCC 606
Pre-suit interest is impermissible under CPC unless stipulated by contract or statute; interest rates must align with statutory limits.
The trial court has misdirected itself on the issue of awarding the interest pendent lite and future interest as envisaged under Section 34 of the CPC.
The court emphasized that mortgage interest rates must reflect contractual agreements and market conditions, allowing for discretion in determining reasonable rates beyond the statutory limit.
The court established that mortgage interest rates must reflect contractual agreements and economic realities, allowing for discretion in determining reasonable rates based on inflation and property ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to reduce an unconscionable and usurious interest rate, based on legal precedents, prevailing market conditions, and the prov....
The court established that while a lender is entitled to recover loan amounts, the interest rate must be reasonable and within statutory limits, reflecting judicial discretion.
In suits based on negotiable instruments, interest is governed by Section 80 of the NI Act, which prescribes 18% per annum when no rate is specified, overriding Section 34 of the C.P.C.
The appellate court modified the interest rate from 24% to 6% p.a. based on judicial discretion, emphasizing the necessity of evidence and jurisdictional validity.
The court affirmed the validity of a promissory note and clarified the burden of proof regarding consideration, modifying the interest awarded.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 does not apply to transactions prior to its enf....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.