THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
RAMENDRA LAL BISWAS S/O- LATE RASTIK LAL BISWAS - Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS - Respondent
WP(C)/2529/2022
Decided On : 04-04-2025
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair. J.
Heard Ms. S. Kanungoe, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M.Bhattacharjee learned Additional Senior Government appearing for the State respondents.
2. The petitioner, by way of instituting the present proceeding, has prayed for the following reliefs: -
(i) By directing the respondent authorities to release regular pension and other pensionary benefits after calculating the 4(four) increments w.e.f. 2013- 16 and the promotion scale to the post of Superintendent due in the year 2014.
(ii) By directing the respondent authorities to grant 4(four) increments w.e.f. 2013 to 2016 and to give promotional scale to the post of Superintendent due in the year 2014.
(iii) By directing the respondent authorities to regularize the period of suspension as on duty, in the interest of justice.
After perusal of the records, cause or case shown if any and upon hearing the parties, Your Lordships may be pleased to make the Rule absolute and/or pass such appropriate Order/Orders or direction as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue, arising in the present proceeding is noticed as under: -
The petitioner, while working as an Accountant, Treasury Establishment at Hailakandi, basing on an allegation of commission of misconduct by him on account of using the monogram of the Treasury Officer unauthorizedly, came to be placed under suspension vide an order dated 12.10.2011. Thereafter, a show-cause notice, under the provisions of Rule 9 of the Assam Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1964, came to be issued upon the petitioner on 29.11.2011. The petitioner had submitted his written statement against the show-cause notice dated 29.11.2011, on 08.12.2011. The said proceeding so drawn up against the petitioner was vide order dated 31.12.2011, closed with a warning issued to him which was also required to be recorded in his service book. The period of suspension undergone by the petitioner was directed to be treated as on leave.
Thereafter, basing on materials coming on record, with regard to commission of misconduct by the petitioner herein, the District Commissioner, Hailakandi, vide an order dated 12.04.2013, proceeded to place the petitioner herein, under suspension. An FIR was also submitted against the petitioner in the matter leading to registration of Hailakandi Police Station Case No. 115/2013, under Sections 25/420 of the IPC. The petitioner, who was arrested in connection with the said criminal case, was extended with the privilege of bail by this Court vide order dated 22.05.2013, passed in Bail Application No. 1198/2013.
The disciplinary authority of the petitioner, thereafter, instituted a departmental proceeding against the petitioner vide issuance of a show-cause notice dated 22.06.2013. The petitioner submitted his written statement in the matter, on 07.08.2013. The disciplinary authority not being satisfied with the written statement so submitted against him, directed for holding of a departmental enquiry in the matter and according, an enquiry officer and a presenting officer came to be appointed. The enquiry officer, thereafter, proceeded to conduct the enquiry and on conclusion of the same, submitted his enquiry report on 10.10.2014. The enquiry officer, in his enquiry report, concluded that the allegation leveled against the petitioner herein, could not be substantiated through concrete evidence and accordingly, the involvement of the petitioner in the matter of sale/issue of fake/counterfeit stamp papers could not be established. After submission of the said enquiry report, the disciplinary authority of the petitioner vide order dated 06.08.2015, proceeded to revoke the suspension of the petitioner and reinstated him in his service. The petitioner, thereafter, on attaining the age of superannuation, retired from his services w.e.f., 31.08.2016.
The departmental proceeding, having not been taken to
The absence of a charge-sheet in pending criminal proceedings allows entitlement to pension and benefits, as departmental proceedings were dropped, exonerating the petitioner.
The right to receive pension and retirement benefits is a valuable right vested in a government servant, protected under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. The court emphasized that the paym....
Withholding of pension and gratuity due to pending criminal proceedings is unconstitutional when departmental charges are dropped and no substantial justification is provided.
Rule 197A of the Pension Rules provides for interest of delayed payment of pension and gratuity.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to provisional pension in the context of suspension, superannuation, and pending criminal proceedings, as per relevant rules and government orders.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reduction in pension should be considered by the authority imposing the penalty at the time of imposition, and failure to do so would amou....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.