SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 448

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
Amit Das S/o Shri Nupur Das - Appellant 
VERSUS 
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent 
WP(C)/6589/2022
Decided On : 11-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR G N SAHEWALLA, MS K BHATTACHARYYA,MR H K SARMA,MS. S. TODI,MR M SAHEWALLA,MD ASLAM
For the Respondent: GA, ASSAM, MR. LENTSO (R-5,6,7),MR. M HUSSAIN (R5,6,7),MR. K KALITA (R-5,6,7),MR. A SARMA (R-5,6,7),MS. S DUTTA, SC, REVENUE & DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT.,MS S BARUAH, GA, ASSAM (R-2 & 3),SC, O I L

Termination of employment based on alleged submission of a fake caste certificate without due process violates principles of natural justice.

Headnote:(A) Oil India Limited Recruitment Policy - Clauses 2.0, 5.1.5, 5.7.1, and 5.7.6 - Termination of employment - The petitioner’s appointment was terminated due to alleged submission of a fake Scheduled Caste certificate without proper verification or notice, violating principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that a caste certificate's validity cannot be declared without a fair hearing. (Paras 2, 6, 36, 41)

(B) Natural Justice - The court reiterated that any action with civil consequences must adhere to natural justice principles, including the right to be heard. (Paras 41, 42)

(C) Caste Certificate Verification - The court highlighted the necessity of a proper inquiry by a Scrutiny Committee as per Supreme Court guidelines before declaring a caste certificate as fake. (Paras 39, 40)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Technician-I but was terminated for allegedly submitting a fake SC certificate. The termination was executed without notice or opportunity to contest the findings.

Findings of Court:
The court found the termination unjust and quashed it, ordering reinstatement while allowing for a fresh inquiry into the caste certificate.

Issues: The main issues were whether the termination was justified and if the principles of natural justice were violated.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the termination was invalid due to lack of proper procedure and opportunity for the petitioner to defend himself against the allegations.

Result: The termination letter dated 23.06.2022 is set aside and quashed, with directions for reinstatement.

JUDGMENT :

GKARDAK ETE, J.

Heard Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr.H.K. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned standing counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent No.1, Ms. A. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 and Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents No. 5, 6 and 7.

2. Challenge made in this petition is to the termination letter dated 23.06.2022 issued by the GM (HR Acquisitions) Officiating for Resident Chief Executive, Oil India Limited, Duliajan, whereby, the appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Operator-I/Assistant Mechanic-I/Assistant Technician-I (Field Engineering) Grade-V, is terminated with immediate effect and blacklisted from applying against any vacancy of Oil India Limited in future on the ground of submission of fake/false Schedule Caste (SC) Certificate.

3. The facts of the case, in brief, are that pursuant to the advertisement by the Oil India Limited inviting application from eligible candidates from its production and exploration area in the district of Dibrugarh, Tinsukia and Charaideo of Assam and Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh for recruitment to the post of various posts including 15 nos. of posts of Assistant Technician-I (Instrumentation) Trainee, Grade-V/Assistant Technician-I (Instrumentation) Inspection Trainee Grade-V, which was distributed amongst the various categories of ST, SC, OBC (NCL) and UR, the petitioner being eligible applied for the said posts of Assistant Technician-I (Instrumentation) Trainee, Grade-V/Assistant Technician-I (Instrumentation) Inspection Trainee Grade-V, under SC category by submitting his application along with all requisite documents. The petitioner claims to be belong to SC category.

4. After various stages of selection process including written test and viva voce, the petitioner was selected as per the final result under unreserved category in spite of the fact that the petitioner duly applied for the post under SC category. Accordingly, the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Operator-I/Assistant Mechanic-I/Assistant Technician-I (Field Engineering) Grade-V on probation for a period of 12 (twelve) months w.e.f. 11.08.2021 vide appointment order dated 11.08.2021. Accordingly, the petitioner joined the said post in the Oil India Limited, Duliajan, Assam.

5. It is the contention of the petitioner that while he was serving in the said post, the petitioner was served with an impugned termination letter dated 23.06.2022, on the ground of submission of alleged fake/false SC certificate by stating that the petitioner’s SC certificate does not match with the official issue register maintained in the Office of the respondent and the respondent No.4 in his report stated that no such certificate was issued during the relevant period. The respondent authorities have issued the impugned termination letter by purportedly invoking the Clauses 2.0 and 5.7.1 of appointment letter without issuance of any notice to the petitioner which is not only in violation of principle of natural justice but also requirement under the terms of the advertisement.

6. Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that a perusal of the impugned Termination letter bearing no. HRAQ/TERM/22-2919 dated 23.06.2022 would reveal that the Respondents have sought to resort to the impugned termination in pursuance to the letters dated 10.01.2022 and dated 25.05.2022 issued by the respondent no. 2 and report issued by the respondent no. 4, of which, the petitioner had no knowledge, nor the petitioner was ever intimated that the respondents have conducted such verification/re-verification of documents. Therefore, the verification/re-verification of documents or enquiry conducted by the respondents being behind the back of the petitioner and the petitioner having been totally deprived of an opportunity to represent his case, has been subjected to grave prejudice as the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top