THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Ajim Uddin Ahmed S/o Lt Abdul Rashid Ali - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C)/6274/2018
Decided On : 24-04-2025
(A) The Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialisation of Services) Act, 2011 - The Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Service Rules, 2003 - Amalgamation of schools - The petitioner challenged the amalgamation order and the appointment of the Headmaster, arguing lack of qualifications of the appointed individual - The court found that the amalgamation followed the SIKSHA KHETRA scheme, which mandates that the Headmaster of the higher school continues post-amalgamation - The petitioner did not challenge the qualifications of the appointed Headmaster or the provisions of the scheme - The court upheld the decisions made by the authorities. (Paras 3, 11, 12, 15, 16)
(B) Educational qualifications - The court emphasized that the qualifications for the Headmaster position were governed by the relevant service rules and provincialisation acts, which were not challenged by the petitioner. (Paras 4, 10, 14)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a qualified teacher, contested the amalgamation of his school with another and the appointment of an unqualified individual as Headmaster.
Findings of Court:
The amalgamation was valid under the SIKSHA KHETRA scheme, and the appointed Headmaster's qualifications were not contested.
Issues: The main issues were the legality of the amalgamation and the qualifications of the appointed Headmaster.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the amalgamation followed the established scheme and the qualifications of the appointed Headmaster were not challenged, thus the decisions were upheld.
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair. J.
Heard Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. H.Terangpi, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 and Ms. R. B. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, BTC, appearing for the respondent nos. 4 & 5.
2. The petitioner, by way of instituting the present proceeding, has presented a challenge to an order dated 18.01.2018, by which, Bhawraguri M. E. School was amalgamated with Janata High School and therein, the name of the respondent no. 6 was reflected as the Headmaster of the amalgamated school. The petitioner has also assailed the speaking order dated 21.07.2018, issued by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Elementary & Secondary School Department, rejecting the claim of the petitioner herein, for being appointed as the Headmaster of the amalgamated school.
3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue, arising in the present proceeding is noticed as under: -
The petitioner, who was a graduate, was appointed as a Science Teacher at Bhawraguri M.E. School on 22.03.1993 in the graduate scale of pay. The petitioner, thereafter, acquired his B.Ed degree in the year 1997. The post of Headmaster in Bhawraguri M.E. School becoming vacant on the incumbent therein, proceeding on superannuation, the petitioner was allowed to hold the charge of the said post. Thereafter, the District Elementary Education Officer, Chirang, vide an order dated 07.11.2016; promoted the petitioner as the Headmaster of Bhawraguri M.E. School. While the petitioner was continuing as the Headmaster of Bhawraguri M.E. School, the respondent authorities, in terms of the “SIKSHA KHETRA” scheme as notified vide the OM dated 22.09.2016, arrived at a decision to amalgamate “Bhawraguri M.E. School” with “Janata High School”, which was located in the same campus. Accordingly, on completion of the requisite formalities, the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Elementary & Secondary School Department vide communication dated 18.01.2018, proceeded to amalgamate “Bhawraguri M.E. School” with “Janata High School”. On such amalgamation, it was provided that the name of the amalgamated school shall be “Janata High School”. The said communication, further, reflected the names of the incumbents holding various posts in the amalgamated school and therein, the name of respondent no. 6, who was the Headmaster of the Janata High School, was also reflected as the Headmaster of the amalgamated school now coming into being.
The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order of amalgamation and further therein, denoting the respondent no. 6 to be the Headmaster of the amalgamated school, approached this Court by way of instituting WP(C) No. 885/2018, assailing the same.
The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 19.02.2018, was pleased to dispose of the said writ petition, directing the Commissioner & Secretary, Govt. of Assam, Elementary & Secondary School Department, to consider the representation dated 29.01.2018, submitted by the petitioner in the matter. The Commissioner & Secretary, Govt. of Assam, Elementary & Secondary School Department was also required to personal hearing to both the petitioner as well as the respondent no. 6 herein.
The Commissioner & Secretary, Govt. of Assam, Elementary & Secondary School Department, in terms of the directions passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 19.02.2018 in WP(C) No. 885/2018, proceeded to consider the issue so arising in the matter and on such consideration, proceeded vide order dated 21.07.2018, to reject the claim made by the petitioner herein for being appointed as the Headmaster of the amalgamated school.
Being aggrieved, the petitioner has instituted the present proceeding.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that “Janata High School” was a Venture School and was provincialised in the year 2013, in terms of the “ The Assam V
The court upheld the amalgamation of schools and the appointment of the Headmaster, emphasizing adherence to the SIKSHA KHETRA scheme and lack of challenge to qualifications.
Section 12 is primarily for purpose of Provincialisation of Venture Schools.
The main legal point established is that eligibility for participation in a selection process is determined at the time of initiation of the process, and subsequent eligibility does not entitle a can....
The Court established that seniority for provincialization of teachers' services must be determined based on accurate service records as per the Assam Education Act, 2017.
Post of Headmaster of ME School shall be re-designated as Assistant Headmaster with same pay scale whatever they are drawing and the post shall be held by the existing Headmaster of the ME School wit....
The School Management Committee had the authority to terminate a teacher's service prior to provincialization notification; thus, the revocation of the cancellation order was in error.
The legal principle established is the requirement to re-designate school staff in accordance with the terms of amalgamation and relevant Office Memorandum.
Seniority in service is determined by the date of regularization, not the initial appointment date, as per the applicable service rules.
A senior language teacher has the primary claim for provincialisation under the Assam Education Act, and failure to provide justifiable reasons for excluding such a claim is arbitrary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.