SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 645

THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH 
Vijay Bishnoi, C.J., N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Employees State Insurance Corporation Rep By The Chairaman Panchdeep Bhawan CIG Marg New Delhi and Ors. – Petitioners 
Versus
Dr. Karabi Kalita And Anr W/O Dr. Jayanta Kumar Choudhury and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/5797/2023
Decided On : 25-03-2025 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K Baishya, Mr. P Kalita
For the Respondent: For Caveator, S Rabha, Ms. R. Engjaipi, Mr. D Das, Mr. R Chakravorty, Mr. R Sharma, Dy.S.G.I.

Transfer of government employees is an inherent condition of service, and courts should not interfere unless there is evidence of mala fides or violation of statutory provisions.

Headnote:(A) Transfer Policy - Clause-8 - Challenge to transfer order - The petitioners challenged the order dated 03.08.2023 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, which directed reconsideration of the transfer of a medical officer. The Tribunal found that the options submitted were not operational, necessitating a fresh consideration. (Paras 5, 24)

(B) Administrative Exigency - The court emphasized that transfer is an inherent condition of service and should not be interfered with unless shown to be mala fide or in violation of statutory provisions. (Paras 16, 18)

(C) Tenure Consideration - The court ruled that the entire service rendered by the respondent at ESICH, Beltola since 01.01.2006 is reckonable for transfer purposes, rejecting claims based solely on the recent promotion. (Paras 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
The respondent was transferred from ESICH, Beltola to DCBO, Darjeeling after 16 years of service. She contested the transfer citing her children's education and alleged violations of transfer policy.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal's order lacked reasoning and was set aside, affirming the transfer order.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the transfer order and the applicability of the transfer policy.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that transfer is a necessary administrative function, and unless proven otherwise, the authority's decision should stand.

Result: The order dated 03.08.2023 was set aside, and the transfer order upheld.

JUDGMENT :

N. Unni Krishnan Nair. J.

Heard Ms. A. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel along with Mr. P. Kalita, learned counsels appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. R. Choudhury, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1.

2. The petitioner, by way instituting the present proceeding has presented a challenge to an order dated 03.08.2023, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Guwahati Bench in Original Application (OA) No. 117/2023.

3. The facts in brief requisite for the purpose of adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding is noticed as under: -

The petitioners herein, vide an order dated 27.06.2022, had required all Group-A Medical Officers working in the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC)Model Hospital and who had completed 03 or more years of continuous service at the Hospital to submit their choice of medical institutions/stations as option for posting. The said options were required to be so submitted by 28.06.2022. The respondent no. 1, who at the relevant point of time was working as a Chief Medical Officer [Non- functional Selection Grade (NFSG)] in pursuance to the said communication dated 27.06.2022, submitted her option for transfer and posting in the following manner: -

S.NoLocation
1ESICH, Beltola
2DCBO, Nagaon
3DCBO, Mangaldoi
4DCBO, Guwahati
5DCBO, Barpeta

The petitioners herein, on consideration of the options submitted by the respondent no. 1 and also keeping in view the necessity for posting officers at various places, proceeded to issue an order of transfer dated 27.12.2022, thereby transferring and posting about 69 doctors to various places. The name of the respondent no. 1 figures at Serial No. 67 of the said order dated 27.12.2022 and she was posted on transfer from ESICH, Beltola, Assam to DCBO, Darjeeling, West Bengal.

The respondent no. 1 being aggrieved by the said order of transfer, submitted a representation and therein, highlighted that her younger daughter was slated to appear in the Class-XII final exams, scheduled in the month of February-March, 2023 and her elder daughter was preparing for All India Entrance Examinations and in absence of their father, who was posted far away from Guwahati, she being the caretaker, requested for being continued at her present place of posting i.e., at ESICH, Beltola. The said representation of the respondent no. 1 found favour with the petitioners and she was exempted from the transfer as effected vide order dated 27.12.2022 till completion of the academic session of her daughter. On completion of the exams of the daughter of the respondent no. 1, vide order dated 28.04.2023, she was released from the ESICH, Beltola and she was directed to join against her transfer place of posting i.e., at DCBO, Darjeeling, West Bengal.

Being aggrieved, the petitioner approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench by way of instituting an Original Application being OA No. 117/2023. The learned Tribunal, upon hearing the parties to the proceeding was pleased to dispose of the said OA vide order dated 03.08.2023. The operative portion of the said order dated 03.08.2023 is extracted herein below: -

5. We have heard the parties and perused the records. It is noted that admittedly other options are there in the ERP system but as per the respondents, they are not operational which came to the knowledge of this Court for the first time when query was made to the learned counsel for the respondents today whereas, there is no such communication on the part of the department that other options except Kamrup Metro, Kamrup Rural and Mangaldoi are not in operation. Therefore, we direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant afresh by treating this O.A. as a part of it and accommodate her at any place within the State of Assam as per their policy and communicate the decision so arrived within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top