Judicial review of administrative transfers is minimal; valid transfer policies do not confer enforceable rights. Employees accepting transfer terms in their contracts cannot contest them after prolonged service.

ORDER :

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Under assail is the common order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench dated 16^th May, 2024 in OA/310/00503, 504 and 506 to 513 and 524 to 526/2024.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

2. The Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation is the writ petitioner before this Court. The respondents filed Original Applications before the Tribunal, seeking to set aside the order of the administrative transfers and the consequential orders. The Tribunal disposed of the Original Applications by issuing directions. Aggrieved by the said order, the Employees State Insurance Corporation has filed the present writ petitions.

3. The respondents, working as Professors / Assistant Professors in Medical Colleges run by the Employees State Insurance Corporation, were transferred from Chennai to other places on administrative grounds and based on organisational requirements. The respondents initially filed original applications before the Central Administrative Tribunal, challenging the transfer order dated 20.05.2023. The Tribunal elaborately considered the issues and dismissed the original applications with a specific direction to the respondents herein to report to duty at the transferred places, since they are the life-saving Doctors to support the administration by serving in exigencies. The respondents were granted liberty to pursue their pending grievances before the Grievances Redressal Committee and the committee shall consider the grievances looking into the administrative constraints.

4. Challenging the said order passed by the Tribunal in batch of original applications, writ petitions are filed in W.P.Nos.31570 and 31592 of 2023 and the Division Bench of the Madras High Court passed final orders on 03.11.2023. The High Court without going into the merits of the case, directed the Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation to give necessary instructions to the Transfer Grievances Redressal Committee to consider the grievances / representations of the respondents and take appropriate decision independently and on its own merits in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order dated 03.11.2023. Pertinently, the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing the original application dated 18^th October, 2023 was not set aside. The High Court granted liberty to the respondents to approach the Grievances Committee and the Committee was directed to consider the grievances and dispose of the same.

5. Pursuant to the orders of the High Court dated 03.11.2023, the Grievance Redressal Committee independently considered the grievances of the respondents on individual basis and rejected the same by not recommending the respondents to retain in their original posts at Chennai. Consequently, relieving orders were passed, relieving the respondents based on the transfer orders issued in May, 2023.

6. Once again the respondents filed original applications before the Tribunal in O.A.Nos.503, 504 and 506 to 513 and 524 to 526 of 2024. The Tribunal again re-adjudicated the transfer orders on merits and passed final orders on 16^th May, 2024 setting a