THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ, N.UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Principal Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Urban Development Department – Appellant
Versus
Pradyut Baruah, S/o. Shri Deben Baruah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.)
Heard Mr. D. Majumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General along with Ms. S.Sarma, learned Government Advocate appearing for the appellants. None has appeared for the respondent no. 1 in spite of service of notice. Also heard, Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department representing the proforma respondent no. 2.
2. The present Intra-Court appeal has been instituted, presenting a challenge to a Judgment and Order dated 14.09.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 1680/2012, allowing the writ petition, instituted by the respondent no. 1 herein.
3. Before proceeding further, it would be appropriate to briefly encapsulate the relevant facts so as to have a proper perspective of the case.
4. The respondent no. 1 herein, was initially recruited as a Sector Inspector Trainee in the Jorhat Development Authority. The Jorhat Development Authority was constituted under the Assam Town and Country Planning Act, 1959. The initial appointment of the respondent no. 1 was regularized as a Sector Inspector Trainee w.e.f., 01.03.2002. The respondent no. 1, in pursuance to an advertisement issued by the Assam Public Service Commission (In s
Pay protection under FR 22 applies only to government servants; non-government employees transitioning to government roles are not entitled to such protection.
The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision granting pay protection, emphasizing adherence to established legal precedents and rejecting arbitrary distinctions in pay protection e....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prescribed scale of pay in the recruitment notification for direct recruitment to government schools prevails over claims for pay protecti....
The main legal point established is that pay protection under clause 11(a)(i)(a) of the University Statute applies only if the employee holds a lien on a permanent post and is not applicable to direc....
Pay protection is a fundamental right under Articles 21 and 300A, and denial based on procedural delays is impermissible.
Pay protection under Bihar Service Code Rule-78 is restricted to State Government employees and not applicable to Central Government employees joining through fresh recruitment.
The service conditions for Teachers in Aided Schools and Government Schools are distinct and separate, and the appointment based on the recruitment process is independent, precluding the entitlement ....
The main legal point established is that the DOP&T OM dated 07.08.1989 aims to protect the 'basic salary' plus 'dearness allowance' of candidates recruited from Public Sector Undertakings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.