IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C. DOSHI, J.
AKASH GANESHBHAI MAKWANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application (For Anticipatory Bail) No. 20549 of 2023
Decided On : 05-12-2023
JUDGMENT :
J.C. DOSHI, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service for the Respondent-State and learned Advocate Mr. Trivedi waives for the First Informant.
1.1 By way of this application, filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘the Code’ herein after), the applicant has prayed to grant him pre-arrest/anticipatory bail in connection with the offence registered as FIR No. 11205035230524 of 2023, with Nakhatrana Police Station, District Kutch, under Sections 306 , 389, 120B and 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .
2. The brief facts of the case are as under:
2.1 After the registration of the accidental death entry, the concerned PI, sent the body of the deceased for carrying out post mortem, recorded the panchnama of the place of incident and also proceeded to record the statements of the concerned persons.
2.1.1 During the course of recording of the statement of one Jagdishbhai Bhagwanbhai @ Bhagubhai Gagal, who happens to be the elder brother of the deceased Dilip Gagal, it was disclosed to the police that one lady (i.e. Ms. D. - Original Accused No. 2) has lodged a complaint against the deceased Dilip Gagal with Mankuva and therefore, his brother appears to have committed the suicide. He, further, requested the concerned PI to carry out investigation on the line of honey trap, black mailing, as well.
2.1.2 Pursuant to the above, the first informant inquired with the Mankuva Police Station and he came to know that one Ms. D. i.e. Original Accused No. 2, has lodged an FIR being 11205013230272 of 2023 with Mankuva Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 376(1) and Sections 3(2)(5), 3(1)(2) (1) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1988 (in brief ‘the Prevention of Atrocities’ Act).
2.1.3 It is further stated in the FIR in question that the PI - First Informant received a report in connection with the investigation done with regard to the FIR being 11205013230272 of 2023, registered with Mankuva Police Station for the purpose of taking the same on the record of Accidental Death Entry No. 25 of 2023, which contained the detailed statement dated 04.06.2023 of Ms. D. - Original Accused No. 2, which was given by her to the concerned IO in the presence of her mother Liliben, Shri Bindiben Pithiya, Social Worker, Kachchh Mahila Vikas Sangathan, Bhuj and Ms. V.R. Chavda, PSI.
2.1.3.1 Ms. D. - Original Accused No. 2 in her statement dated 04.06.2023 has stated that she was studying in F.Y.B.A. in Arts and Commerce College, Vasna, Ahmedabad, but, she was not attending the college regularly and instead, she was working in a company named ‘Welset Holidays’ which was run by one Ajay Prajapati - Original Accused No. 3. The company used to book hotels in different cities for their clients, who wanted to go on a tour. However, as she did not get her salary and the company was closed, she left the job.
2.1.3.2 It is further stated by Ms. D. that after the aforesaid company was closed, she made a request to Ajay Prajapati - Original Accused No. 3 to start a business. However, nothing could be worked out. Ms. D. stated that somewhere in the month of May, 2023, she received a phone call from Ajay Prajapati and he asked her to come to his office and a
Adri Dharan Das v. State of West Bengal
CBI Vs. Santosh Karnani & Anr. 2023 (6) SCALE 250
Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
P. Chidambaram vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs. NCT Delhi & Another
Pratibha Manchanda vs. State of Haryana
The court emphasized the need for a balance between individual liberty and societal interest in granting anticipatory bail, considering the nature and gravity of the accusations, the accused's antece....
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy, granted sparingly in serious cases, and requires compliance with court conditions; failure to do so can lead to rejection of bail applications.
The judgment emphasizes the need for clear evidence of instigation or active facilitation to establish guilt in cases of abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.
Lack of substantial evidence linking the accused to the crime justifies granting pre-arrest bail under Section 438, ensuring individual liberty is protected against unwarranted arrest.
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted sparingly, especially in serious cases, and requires strict compliance with court-imposed conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.