IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Longdise Sangtam S/o Mukhichu Sangtam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER, J.
The present appeal under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (Hereinafter referred to as the MV Act of 1988) has been preferred by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the Judgment and Award dated 31.05.2022 passed by the learned MACT, Mokokchung, Nagaland in MAC Case No. 12/2020.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Vikramjeet Devnath and Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the claimant/respondent no. 1 (R-1). None appears for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.
3. In the present case, the R-1 as claimant had filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the MV Act of 1988 before the MACT, Mokokchung, Nagaland being registered as MAC Case No. 12/2020 claiming compensation on account of the injuries sustained by him in a road traffic accident on 29.01.2020 involving a vehicle bearing No. NL-02C-6422, wherein the claimant/R-1 was walking on foot on the roadside of Old Dikhu Road near Chuchuyimpang Village, Mokokchung. While walking, the Maruti car bearing No. NL-02C-6422 hit him from the opposite direction. As a result he sustained bodily injury, with a compound fracture of Tibia and was rushed to the hospital. In the c
The necessity for concrete medical evidence to establish the extent of disability in compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act was emphasized, highlighting the need for a proper assessment of ....
A claimant cannot seek compensation under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act if they are not the owner of the vehicle, necessitating claims under Section 166 instead.
The court ruled that claims under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act are not maintainable for non-owners of the vehicle, emphasizing the need for medical evidence in assessing disability and co....
The main legal point established is the liability of the insurer to pay compensation for injuries sustained due to negligent driving, as well as the entitlement to interest under Section 171 of the M....
The liability of the owner and insurer in accidents involving motor vehicles, and the entitlement to compensation in the absence of fault or negligence on the part of the driver.
The liability of the owner and insurer in motor accident cases, even in the absence of driver negligence, and the maintainability of claim petitions for personal injuries under the M.V. Act.
The Tribunal must actively assess the impact of permanent disability on earning capacity, and disability certificates from competent authorities should be accepted without further proof unless there ....
The court determined that the insurance company is liable for compensation due to reckless driving by the offending vehicle, and recalibrated the amount based on findings of total disability and nece....
The court emphasized the need to ascertain the effect and impact of permanent disability on the claimant's earning capacity and highlighted the importance of following the principles enunciated by th....
The court emphasized that compensation for personal injury must be just and equitable, reflecting the claimant's loss of earning capacity and future prospects, while ensuring the assessment of perman....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.