SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 853

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
M/s Matshya Gandha Matshya Bebasai Samabai Samity Ltd - Appellant 
Versus
The State Of Assam And 7 Ors - Respondents 
WP(C)3826 of 2022
Decided on : 19-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. D DAS SR. ADV, MS. R DUTTA, MR. S KATAKI, MR D J MEDHI, MR S KHOUND
For the Respondent: GA, ASSAM, MR. K.H. CHOUDHURY (FOR CAVEATOR), MR. L MOHAN (FOR CAVEATOR), MS F BEGUM (FOR CAVEATOR), MR. J I BORBHUIYA (FOR CAVEATOR)

The term 'neighborhood' in fishery settlements is to be interpreted pragmatically, emphasizing community proximity over mere distance, and administrative authority's decisions should not be disturbed unless shown to be arbitrary or mala fide.

Headnote:(A) Assam Fishery Rules 1953 - Issue of settlement of fishery - Tender for fishery settlement was issued and bids were submitted by various societies; a society was initially awarded the settlement, but its settlement was later canceled on the basis of a higher bid from another society. The order of cancellation of settlement was challenged by the original settler, stating the lack of opportunity to be heard before cancellation, and that the new settler's members do not reside in the neighborhood. The Court held that the term 'neighborhood' should not be strictly defined by distance alone but should consider broader criteria, including the practicality of fostering local livelihoods. The government found the concerns about the higher bidder's neighborhood status to be credible, as they fulfilled the eligibility for the settlement based on community connections and other evaluations. The Court affirmed the authority's decision to settle in favor of the higher bidder, emphasizing the principle of judicial restraint in reviewing administrative decisions regarding tenders. (Paras 12, 25, 30, 31, 44)

Table of Content
1. details surrounding fishery bids and settlements. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. settlement of fisheries must consider equality in bidding and localities. (Para 8)
3. arguments regarding the qualifications and membership of bidder societies. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 15)
4. defences regarding procedural legitimacy of the bidding process. (Para 14 , 19 , 21)
5. importance of interpretation of tender documents in judicial review. (Para 18 , 36 , 38)
6. judicial interpretation on the term 'neighbourhood' in relation to fisheries. (Para 24 , 26 , 27 , 28)
7. arguments must substantiate claims of procedural irregularities and local eligibility. (Para 31)
8. judicial restraint is essential in administrative decisions. (Para 39 , 43)
9. final decisions and dismissals of the writ petitions. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

Heard Mr. S. Kataki, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner in WP(c)3826/2022, and respondent No. 7, in WP(c)3975/2022, and WP(c)4208/2022; and Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(c)3975/2022, and WP(c)4208/2022. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State respondents in all these 3(three) writ petitions.

2. The issue involved in the above-noted 3(three) petitions pertains to the settlement of a fishery, namely, No. 11, Part 5, Kolong Nadi Fishery, Morigaon District, for a period of 7(seven) years, in pursuance to an Notice Inviting Tender(NIT), issued on 27-09-2021.

3. For the sake of convenience, the facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the above-noted writ petitions, is noticed from WP(c)4208/2022 and the parties to the proceedings are also described as they are placed in the said writ petition.

4. The said writ petition i.e. WP(c)4208/2022, was instituted by M/S Dhipujijan Garanga Garchak Malia Meen Palon CSS Ltd.. The Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon, vide Notice Inviting Tender(NIT), dated 27-09-2021, had invited bids for settlement of No. 11, Part 5, Kolong Nadi Fishery, Morigaon District, for a period of 7 years. The last date fixed for submission of bids was 22-10-2021. The petitioner, herein, along with the respondent No. 7, namely, M/S Matchyagandha Matchya Bebosayee Samity Ltd, Dhankhunda (Malobosti), submitted their respective bids in the matter.

5. On the opening of the bids, a comparative statement was made by the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner. The respondent No. 7 Society i.e. M/S Matchyagandha Matchya Bebosayee Samity Ltd, Dhankhunda(Malobosti), was found to have offered its bid at Rs. 65,17,007/- for a period of 7 years at the uniform rate of Rs. 9,31,001/- per annum. The petitioner Society i.e. M/S Dhipujijan Garanga Garchak Malia Meen Palon CSS Ltd., had quoted an amount of Rs. 63,77,000/- for a period of 7 years at the uniform rate of Rs. 9,11,000/- per annum, whereas, No. 11, Part 5, Kolong Nadi Fishery, Morigaon District, had offered its bid at Rs. 63,00,763/- for a period of 7 years at the uniform rate of Rs. 9,00,109/- per annum. Accordingly, it is seen that respondent No. 7 Soicety had quoted the highest rate. The matter was, thereafter, forwarded to the Government in the Fisheries Department. The Government in the Fisheries Department on receipt of the tender documents along with the comments/report submitted by the Office of the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner, proceeded to issue an order, dated 25-05-2022, settling the said fishery with the petitioner Society i.e. M/S Dhipujijan Garanga Garchak Malia Meen Palon CSS Ltd., at its offered rate. The petitioner Society, thereafter, submitted his first kisht in the matter and was awaiting issuance of orders towards handing over the fishery to it.

6. At this stage, being aggrieved; the respondent No. 7 i.e. M/S Matchyagandha Matchya Bebosayee Samity Ltd, Dhankhunda(Malobosti), had approached the Government by way of submitting representation, pleading for review of the order, dated 27-05-2022. On a consideration o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top