IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
Dipjyoti Borah Son Of Late Rajen Borah - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No. 3926 Of 2025
Decided On : 18-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's business and gst registration details. (Para 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. reasons for late submission of gst returns. (Para 3 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. procedure and provisions for gst registration cancellation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. order for restoration process and obligations of the petitioner. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
Heard Shri R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance & Taxation for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been carrying out his proprietorship business under the name & style, “Shri Dipjyoti Borah” as the sole proprietor. He is an Assesee registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017/Assam Goods and Services Tax (AGST) Act, 2017 bearing registration No. 18AOAPB8032R1ZP. On the reason of non-filing of GST returns for a continuous period of six months, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice bearing reference No.ZA180522002196V dated 04.05.2022 asking him to furnish reply to the aforesaid notice within a period of 30 (thirty) days from the date of service of notice and it was mentioned in the aforesaid show cause notice that if the petitioner fails to furnish a reply within the stipulated date or fails to appear for personal hearing on the appointed date and time, the case will be decided ex-parte on the basis of the available records and on merits. Thereafter, the impugned order dated 06.06.20223 was passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Guwahati-D-S whereby the petitioner’s GST registration has been cancelled for not furnishing returns for a continuous period of 6 (six) or more months.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to non-conversant of online procedure and also for the loss sustained during Covid-19, he could not visit the GST portal and accordingly could not submit any reply to the said show cause notice in time. It is further contended that when the petitioner came across the said notice, the time for filing reply and attending the hearing was already over and order had also been uploaded in the portal.
4. The petitioner further contends that after recovering from impact of Covid-19, he updated all his pending returns up to the month of June, 2022 as allowed by the GST portal and while updating his returns, the petitioner has also discharged all his GST dues along with his late fees and interest.
5. Thereafter, the petitioner tried to file the necessary application seeking revocation of GST cancellation, however, the same could not be filed as the time limit prescribed for filing of revocation application was elapsed and a message was displayed in the screen “timeline of 270 days from the date of cancellation order provided to taxpayer to file application for revocation of cancellation is expired.”
6. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
7. Shri Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to comply with all the formalities required as per proviso to sub-
rule (4) of Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
8. As per Section 29 (2)(c), an officer, duly empowered, may cancel the GST registration of a person from such date, including any retrospective date, as he deems fit, where any registered person, has not furnished returns for a continuous period of 6 (six) months. Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017 has laid down the procedure for cancellation of the registration. The said Rule is extracted herein below:
“Rule 22 : Cancellation of Registration (1) Where the proper officer has reasons to believe that the registration of a person is liable to be cancelled under Section 29 , he shall issue a notice to such person in FORM GST REG-17, requiring him to show cause, within a period of seven working days from the date of the service of such notice, as to why his registration shall not be cancelled.
(2) The reply to the show c
If a taxpayer is ready to comply with GST filing requirements after cancellation for non-filing, the empowered officer may restore their registration under the CGST Rules.
Cancellation of GST registration without a hearing violates principles of natural justice; applicants can seek restoration by fulfilling statutory requirements.
GST registration can be restored if the taxpayer complies with filing requirements and pays outstanding dues, despite prior cancellation due to non-filing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.