Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Gauhati High Court (Principal Seat) Employees Association – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Heard Mr. KN Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. J Patowary, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. TR Gogoi, the learned Government Advocate, Assam, who appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 4, Mr. B Gogoi, the learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, who appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Mr. TJ Mahanta, the learned Senior Counsel as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the Gauhati High Court (Principal Seat) assisted by Mr. PP Dutta, the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent No.5.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the speaking order No.FTC.8/2007/PT/196 dated 03.08.2022 whereby the approval sought under the proviso to Article 229 of the Constitution in respect of the Gauhati High Court (Revised Pay) Rules 2013, (Structure and Fixation) (for short, ‘the Draft Rules of 2013’) as amended in 2021 was declined on the ground of financial crunch of the Government. The petitioner Association further seeks for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the State to hold discussion with the competent authority in the matter and thereafter grant approval to the Draft Ru
The Chief Justice has exclusive authority to set pay and service conditions for court employees under Article 229(2), and financial constraints cannot justify the refusal of approval for such determi....
The Chief Justice's recommendations for pay scales under Article 229 must be approved by the state unless there are strong reasons for refusal, emphasizing the principle of equal pay for equal work.
Article 229 (2) of Constitution of India nowhere prescribes or indicates any particular form in which rule should be framed nor does it prescribe any formality required to be gone through.
The Chief Justice has the discretion to appoint the Registrar (Establishment) from both the Principal Seat and Permanent Benches, as the Rules of 1967 do not restrict this.
Principal Seat Pay must be included in the calculation of basic pay for employees, ensuring equal treatment under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Equal pay for equal work is mandated when the employer recognizes parity between roles, as upheld by constitutional provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the invocation of the equal pay doctrine and the consideration of Rules framed under Article 229 of the Constitution, which establish parity betwee....
The Rule and the recommendation in question, made by the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of Kerala, were implicitly supported by the reasons as extracted afore, it is distressing that Government does not e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
