IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MARLI VANKUNG
Cholamandalam M/s General Insurance Company Ltd. r/b Sh Gautam Pradhan Asst Manager – Appellant
Versus
Vanlalhriati and Ors. W/o Hranghluna (L) – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
Heard Mr. Roshan Subedi, learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company. Also heard Mr. Lalremtluanga, learned counsel for the claimant respondent No. 1.
2. This is an appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the impugned Judgment & Award dated 02.11.2023 passed by the learned Member-cum-Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aizawl in MAC Case No. 43/2019, wherein the learned Tribunal had awarded the sum of Rs. 20,49,000/- with 7% interest per annum, from the date of filing the application i.e., on 06.08.2019 to be paid by the Insurance Company/appellant.
3. Facts of the case in brief is that the daughter of the claimant Lalrempuii, aged 34 years died in the vehicular accident on 05.04.2019 at 2:15 PM, when one tripper bearing registration No. MZ 01 M-7405 belonging to the respondent No. 2, which was driven by respondent No. 2, while proceeding towards Mamit side, carrying a load of stone chips, knocked down the Scooty bearing registration No. MZ 01/3847 driven by Lalrempuii (deceased) with one pillion rider. The accident caused the instant death of Scooty driver Lalrempuii, while the pillion rider is
National Insurance Company Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.
Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.