Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT KOHIMA BENCH
RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Maytas-Gayatri Jv – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland And Anr Kohima – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 30 , 32 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.
Heard Mr. K. Luikang Michael, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mr. M. Kasar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Ms. S. Mere, learned P.P. for the respondent No.1.
2. The present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr. P.C by the four petitioners praying for quashing of the order dated 21/05/2019 issued by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Longleng, Nagaland in C.R Case No. 01/2018 against the petitioners and also for quashing of the summons issued consequentially. The petitioners have also prayed for quashing of Criminal Case No. 01/2018 registered u/s 406/417/420 IPC against the petitioners pending before the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Longleng, Nagaland.
3. The case as projected in the pleadings is that the petitioner No.1 claims to be a joint venture incorporated under the Companies Act, having its Office at th Door No.8-2-120/113/3,4 Floor, Sanali Info Park, Cyber Towers, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500033. The petitioner No.1 had entered into a contract with the Chief Engineer, PWD, (N.H), Naga
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
