Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT KOHIMA BENCH
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
T.L. Construction – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in a construction contract (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. conditions affecting contract execution (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. contractual dispute over payment rates (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. completion and payment issues in construction (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. judicial observations on contract termination (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. jurisdiction and maintainability of the contract dispute (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. delays and financial implications of contract execution (Para 44 , 45) |
| 8. court's directive on payment settlements (Para 62 , 64) |
| 9. final disposition of the petition (Para 66 , 67) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, J.
The petitioner in this case is M/S T. L. Construction. The Union of India represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, the Director (Project), RITES Ltd., the General Manager (Construction), Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, the General Manager (CP), RITES Ltd., the Senior Deputy Manager (CP) RITES Ltd. and the Executive Engineer (Construction) of Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti are arrayed as respondent No. 1 to 6 respectively.
2. The Railway Technical Engineering Services Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as RITES) is a construction agency for and on beha
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
