THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Mitra Chakraborty (Kanu) W/o Dulan Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to select list and reservation rules. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 2. facts regarding advertisement for recruitment. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. procedural background on prior petition. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. arguments regarding reservation implementation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. judicial observations on reservation laws. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 34) |
| 6. court’s conclusions on candidate selections. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. final judgment and orders. (Para 39 , 41) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. R. J. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. I have also heard Mr. T. J. Mahanta, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. P. Sarma, the learned counsel along with Mr. H. K. Das, the learned Standing counsel of the Gauhati High Court appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 3, 4 & 5 and Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 6 to 16.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the select list dated 18.02.2024 and seeking directions that the highest ranked woman candidate in the Unreserved categor
Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission and Others
Saurav Yadav and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.