UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Sadhana Singh Dangi – Appellant
Versus
Pinki Asati – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals challenge the final judgment and order dated 29.04.2020 passed by the High Court1[The High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur] in Writ Petition No.19126 of 2019 and in other connected matters.
3. The present controversy arises out of the process of selection undertaken pursuant to Advertisement dated 12.12.2017 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (“MPPSC” for short) inviting applications for the posts of Assistant Professors in various disciplines.
4. After the process of selection was over, the Select List was published by the MPPSC which gave rise to challenge by way of Writ Petition No.21091 of 2018 before the High Court. The challenge, however, stood disposed of on a statement made by the learned Advocate General for the State that a revised list would be published after considering all the issues and various objections raised by the concerned parties. Later, revised Select List for various disciplines were published on different dates during the period 20.08.2019 to 03.10.2019.
5. This led to the f
Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. (1995) 5 SCC 173
Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal v. Mamta Bisht & Others
Rajesh Kumar Daria v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Others
Rajesh Kumar Daria vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission (2007) 8 SCC 785
Saurav Yadav & Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.