SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2087

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Hussain Md. Rijuan @ Hussain Mahammad Rizuwan, S/o Tafazul Hussain -  Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam represented by the Public Prosecutor - Respondent
Crl.Pet. 800 of 2021
Decided On : 15-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. J. Saikia, Senior Advocate, Ms. M. Nirola, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. R. J. Baruah, Addl. PP, Mr. S. Nawaz, Advocate for R-2

The court emphasized the requirement of direct evidence of instigation and mens rea for establishing charges of abetting suicide under Section 306 IPC, distinguishing physical relationships from legal definitions under the POCSO Act.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 417, 306, 376 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 6 - Petition challenging order of Special Judge taking cognizance of offences and continuation of proceedings - Court found no prima facie materials for abetment of suicide or for charges under IPC Sections 417, 306, and 376 - Allegations did not constitute sexual relationship as per POCSO - Considered elements of abetment and mens rea crucial for Section 306, highlighting absence of instigation - Cognizance under Section 306 set aside, but upheld for Sections 417 and 376 along with Section 6 of POCSO. (Paras 30, 39)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of causing mental agony leading to suicide of a minor daughter of the informant, following allegations of a love relationship and refusal to marry. The FIR originally covered Sections 417 and 306, later adding Section 376 related to POCSO.

Findings of Court:
The court determined lack of evidence for abetment under Section 306, stating that mere allegations without proof of relationship to the suicide were insufficient. However, prima facie evidence existed for offences under Sections 376 and 6 of the POCSO Act.

Issues: The court examined if the evidence satisfied the conditions for charge under IPC Sections and POCSO, particularly focusing on mens rea for abetment of suicide.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that mere denial of physical relationship by the deceased undermined claims of abetment of suicide, emphasizing on required proof of instigation for upholding Section 306 applicable only if certain mental elements and actions of the accused were directly linked to the suicide.

Result: The petition was partly allowed; cognizance under Section 306 quashed, but actions under Sections 417 and 376 confirmed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and charges. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments challenging the charges. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. state's perspective on the charges. (Para 15 , 16)
4. court's overview of the case materials. (Para 18 , 19)
5. legal definitions related to abetment. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. explanation of the concept of abetment. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
7. discussion on mens rea in abetment. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
8. court's findings on abetment of suicide. (Para 29 , 30)
9. discussion on sexual offenses. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
10. evaluation of the application of pocso act. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
11. conclusion and judgment on charges. (Para 39)
12. final court order. (Para 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT :

ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.

Date : 15-12-2025

Heard Mr. P. J. Saikia, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. M. Nirola, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. PP for the State of Assam and Mr. S. Nawaz, learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2/Informant.

2. The instant application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., 1973 read with Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. assailing the order dated 12.01.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, Nagaon in Special POCSO Case No.04/2021 (Rupahihat P.S. Case No.482/2020) taking cognizance of the offence under Section 417/306/376 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act as well as continuation of the proceeding of the said case.

3. It is the case of the Petitioner that on 20.07.2020, one Md. Bajrul Rahman i.e. the Opposite Party No. 2 had lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-Charge of Rupahihat Police Station alleging,amongst others, that the Petitioner was in a love relationship with his daughter for the last two years with a promise to marry her. It was alleged that on being asked, his daughter, she told him that the Petitioner loves her and he would be marrying her. It was alleged that the Informant and his family came to know that the Petitioner secretly called their daughter and took her to various places and established physical relationship with her. It was alleged that on 16/17th July, 2020, the Petitioner communicated with his daughter on her mobile phone and informed that he would not be marrying her. It was alleged that since that incident, they saw their daughter crying in the house and on being asked, she informed them about the aforementioned facts. It was alleged that his daughter suffered from mental agony because of refusal of marriage by the Petitioner and therefore, she committed suicide by hanging herself in their house on 19.07.2020. On receipt of the FIR, the investigating authority registered Rupahihat P.S. Case No. 482/2020 under Section 417/306 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. It is mentioned that initially the case was registered under Section 417/306 of the Indian Penal Code but subsequently on the prayer of the Investigating Officer, the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagaon, vide order dated 13.10.2020 added Section 376 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act and transferred the case to the learned Special Judge, Nagaon and since then, the matter is pending before the Special Judge, Nagaon.

5. It is the case of the Petitioner that coming to know about lodging of such FIR, the Petitioner voluntarily appeared before the I.O. of the case but on such appearance, the Petitioner was arrested and produced before the learned Special Judge, Nagaon on 17.10.2020. On completion of the investigation, the I.O. of the case submitted a part charge sheet against the Petitioner vide charge sheet No.01/2021 in connection with the aforesaid case under Section 417/306/376 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

6. On receipt of the Part Charge Sheet, the learned Special Judge, Nagaon, vide order dated 12.01.2021 passed in Special POCSO Case No. 04/2021, took cognizance of the offence against the Petitioner under Section 417/306/376 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Section

6 of the P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top