SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2136

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Marjana Begum, Daughter of Kholil Uddin – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, Government of Assam, Judicial Department and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition [C] No. 4600 of 2025
Decided On : 16-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T.A. Laskar, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.S. Roy, Junior Government Adv., Mr. R. Dubey, Standing Counsel, Assam State Election Commission [ASEC], Mr. S. Dutta, Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development [P&RD] Department, Mr. I.A. Talukdar, Adv.

The court confirmed that allowing a subordinate to perform a ministerial act like tossing a coin does not violate the principle of non-delegation if essential functions are preserved.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 - Election process for post of President - Petitioner challenged election results citing irregularities, particularly regarding decision to break tie by tossing a coin with a third party - Validity of such action questioned in reference to delegation principles as the act performed was considered ministerial rather than essential. (Paras 1, 28, 36)

(B) Procedure - Elections - Authorised Officer's decision to allow a subordinate to toss a coin was held not to contravene the principle 'delegatus non potest delegare'; it did not affect the election legitimacy as essential functions were adhered to, thus no grounds for sub-delegation error. (Paras 32, 36, 38)

(C) Election process must abide by procedural integrity - Any claim of electoral unfairness should be substantiated; complaints without immediate protest during the meeting weaken the arguments. (Paras 11, 41)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the election of the President of the Gaon Panchayat after a tie was settled by coin toss conducted by an assistant and filed for a writ after election petition was returned due to jurisdiction issues (Paras 1, 12).

Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the petition as proper procedures were followed; thus, the election results were upheld (Paras 42).

Issues: Whether the election was vitiated by allowing a third party to toss the coin, and if jurisdiction issues around the election petition were valid (Paras 11, 41).

Ratio Decidendi: The act of tossing the coin by a subordinate under the Authorised Officer's supervision did not breach delegation principles. No evidence supported claims of impropriety since the essential functions were performed correctly and with consent from all parties present (Paras 36, 38).

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to election validity (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 12)
2. court's review of electoral procedures (Para 14 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23)
3. petitioner's arguments on election procedure (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. delegation of authority in elections (Para 27 , 29)
5. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit (Para 42)

JUDGMENT :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

1. In this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assail is made to a decision arrived at and given by the respondent no. 5 in connection with the election conducted on 30.06.2025 for the post of President of 39 Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat within Binakandi Development Block and Hojai Zilla Parishad. The petitioner has challenged the decision to declare the respondent no. 7 as the President of 39 Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat and has sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to re-conduct the election to the post of President, 39 Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat. In addition, the petitioner has sought for an appropriate writ for setting aside of an Order dated 29.07.2025 passed in Election Petition no. 03/2025 whereby the District Judge, Hojai returned the Election Petition preferred by the petitioner and also for a direction to the Election Tribunal, Nagaon to entertain the election petition to be re-filed by the petitioner by condoning the delay.

2. The background facts leading to the institution of the writ petition can be narrated at first. Vide a Notification dated 02.04.2025, the Assam State Election Commission [ASEC] notified the Schedule of General Election to the Panchayats in the State of Assam. As per the notification, the date of polling for election to the Panchayats in Hojai district was scheduled in the second phase on 07.05.2025.

3. The petitioner is an elector from Village – Marjong Pather, which falls within the territorial limits of Ward no. 3 of 39 Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat. To contest in the election for Ward Member from Ward no. 3, the petitioner filed her nomination paper which, on scrutiny, was accepted. The respondent no. 7 stood in the election for Ward Member from Ward no. 9 of Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat. After counting of votes on 11.05.2025, the petitioner and the respondent no. 7 were declared elected as Ward Members from Ward no. 3 and Ward no. 9 respectively of Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat.

4. After declaration of the results of the Panchayat Election, 2025, the District Commissioner, Hojai [the respondent no. 4] passed an Order on 10.06.2025 authorizing a number of officials from the District Administration, Hojai/Hojai Zilla Parishad to conduct and preside over the first meeting of the Gaon Panchayats within Hojai district as per the scheduled time and date at the concerned Gaon Panchayat offices as per the provisions of Section 6 [3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended, and Rule 46 of the Assam Panchayat [Constitution] Rules, 1995. The first meeting was called for two purposes, firstly, to administer oath of affirmation to the newly elected Gaon Panchayat Ward Members; and secondly, to elect the President and the Vice- President of the Gaon Panchayats from amongst the elected Ward Members as per procedure. In so far as the first meeting for Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat was concerned, the Block Development Officer [BDO], Binakandi Development Block [the respondent no. 5] was notified as the Authorised Officer to conduct and preside over the first meeting of Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat, which was scheduled at 11-30 a.m. on 24.06.2025. The details of the Secretary of Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat was mentioned in the Order dated 10.06.2025.

5. It may be stated that the post of President of Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat was unreserved whereas the post of Vice-President was reserved for woman.

6. Another Order came to be issued by the respondent no. 4 on 18.06.2025 in partial modification of the previous Order dated 10.06.2025 whereby the first Meeting of few of the Gao

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top