SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Sri Abisekh Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondents
WP(C) 7290 of 2025 
Decided On : 08-01-2026

Advocates appeared:
For the petitioner (s):Mr. R. Borah, Advocate
For the respondent (s): Mr. S. S. Roy, CGC Mr. T. C. Chutia, Addl. Sr. GA

The court upheld that candidates must submit required OBC certification to be considered eligible under the reservation category as detailed in the recruitment advertisement, thereby validating the rejection of their applications.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Advertisement - Clause 6 - Eligibility Criteria - OBC Certificate Requirement - Petitioners challenged rejection due to non-submission of OBC certificates—Advertisement stated age limit and required documentation for vacancies—Said documents must be produced for claim of reservations and age relaxation—Failure to provide required certificates led to rejection under Clause 6.1 and Clause 6.5—Rejection upheld as legal and not arbitrary. (Paras 2-12)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Writ petitions in recruitment matters are bound by clear requirements stipulated in advertisements—Courts cannot entertain applications lacking requisite documentation leading to automatic disqualification. (Paras 2, 11)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners applied for Constable GD positions under the OBC category as per advertisement dated 05.09.2024, highlighting age limits and certificate requirements. They failed to present OBC certificates during verification, leading to their candidature rejection on 29.11.2025.

Findings of Court:
Rejection of candidature deemed valid as the petitioners did not satisfy the eligibility conditions set forth in the recruitment advertisement.

Issues: The main issues were whether the rejection of candidature was warranted based on non-submission of required OBC certificates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the advertisement's requirements were clear and mandatory. Without presenting the required certificates, candidates could not claim benefits under the OBC category.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. candidature requirements and eligibility criteria (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. rejection due to lack of required certificates (Para 7 , 8)
3. petitioners' challenge through writ petition (Para 9)
4. court's reasoning regarding rejection legality (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's dismissal of the writ petition (Para 13)

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

Heard Mr. R. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned CGC who appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 7 and Mr. T. C. Chutia, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate who appears on behalf of the respondent No.8.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari challenging the impugned rejection slips dated 29.11.2025 issued by the respondent No.7 and further seeking a direction upon the Respondent Authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioners under the OBC (Non Creamy Layer) category after making necessary verification with the District Commissioner, West Karbi Anglong, if required, and further direct the respondents to do the needful to appoint the petitioners if found fit in medical examination and otherwise meritorious.

3. The facts of the instant case which arises are that on 05.09.2024, an advertisement was issued for recruitment to the post of Constable GD in the Central Armed/Police Forces (CAPFs) and SSF, Rifleman (GD) in the Assam Rifles and Sepoy in Narcotics Control Bureau Examination-2025. In the said advertisement, various dates have been mentioned. For the purpose of submission of the online application form, the window was from 05.09.2024 to 14.10.2024. It is also categorically mentioned that the last date and time for receipt of online application form is on 14.10.2024 on or before 11:00 PM.

4. The petitioners herein who admittedly belong to the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category applied in pursuance to the said advertisement for the posts of Constable GD. Clause 5 of the advertisement stipulated the age limit. The age of the candidates must be 18 to 23 years as of 01.01.2025, i.e. candidates born not before 02.01.2002 and not later than 01.01.2007. However, in respect to certain categories of candidates, the advertisement further prescribed age relaxation. In the case of SC or ST category, the age relaxation is five years and OBC is three years. Clause 6 of the advertisement stipulated the process of certification and the format of certificates. In terms with Clause 6.1, the candidates who wish to be considered against reserved vacancies or seek age relaxations are required to submit the requisite certificate from the Competent Authority in the prescribed format when such certificates are sought by the CAPFs concerned for document verification at the time of DME. It is further mentioned in the said Clause itself that if such requisite certificates are not produced, the claim of the candidates for SC/ST/OBC/EWS/ESM category would not be entertained and their candidature/application would be considered under the Unreserved Category. Further to that, the said Clause also mandated that if the candidate has sought any other age relaxation or claimed ESM status and is not able to produce the relevant certificate, he would be considered in his respective category, i.e. SC/ST/OBC/EWS/UR. The formats of the certificates have also been provided in the Notice dated 05.09.2024. The certificate for Other Backward Classes is at Annexure-VII to the Notice of Examination. The contents of the said certificate being relevant are reproduced hereunder:

Annexure-VII

FORM OF CERTIFICATE TO BE PRODUCED BY OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES APPLYING FOR APPOINTMENT TO POSTS UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

This is to certify that Shri/ Smt./ Kumari _________________ son/ daughter of ________ of village/town __________________________________________ in District/Division___________________________ in the State/Union Territory _________ belongs to the _____________

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top