SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 251

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Sri Abisekh Chauhan, S/o. Durgesh Chauhan – Petitioner 
Versus
The Union of India, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government Of India, Ministry Of Home Affairs – Respondents
WP(C) No.7290 of 2025
Decided On : 08-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Borah.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.S. Roy, CGC Mr. T.C. Chutia, Addl. Sr. GA.

Petitioners challenging rejection of candidature for lack of required OBC certificates upheld, confirming compliance with recruitment norms and dismissing claims of illegality.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Recruitment Notification - Writ petition filed challenging rejection of candidature for failing to produce required OBC certificate for document verification - Age limit and age relaxation prescribed by recruitment advertisement - Clauses regarding certification outlines strict requirements for OBC eligibility - Petitioners did not submit requisite certificates during the verification process, resulting in rejection slips dated 29.11.2025. (Paras 2, 4, 7)

(B) Certiorari - Scope - The court evaluated whether the rejection of candidatures was illegal or arbitrary, determining that it complied with the stipulated terms in the recruitment notice - Thus, upholding the authority’s decision. (Paras 12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners applied for the post of Constable GD under the OBC category according to the recruitment advertisement issued on 05.09.2024, but failed to provide the mandated OBC certificates leading to their rejection at the verification stage.

Findings of Court:
The petitioners’ inability to produce the necessary OBC certificates during document verification as prescribed in the advertisement rendered their candidatures invalid, with no basis for contesting the rejection as illegal.

Issues: Whether the rejection of the petitioners’ candidatures for failing to produce OBC certificates was lawful and justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the rejection was in adherence to the recruitment process stipulated in the advertisement, affirming that the failure to produce the necessary certificate was grounds for disqualification.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria for obc candidates. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. requirement to produce obc certificates. (Para 6 , 7)
3. consequences of failing to present required documentation. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's assessment of the compliance with application requirements. (Para 10 , 11)
5. dismissal of writ petition not seen as illegal. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

Heard Mr. R. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned CGC who appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 7 and Mr. T. C. Chutia, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate who appears on behalf of the respondent No.8.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari challenging the impugned rejection slips dated 29.11.2025 issued by the respondent No.7 and further seeking a direction upon the Respondent Authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioners under the OBC (Non Creamy Layer) category after making necessary verification with the District Commissioner, West Karbi Anglong, if required, and further direct the respondents to do the needful to appoint the petitioners if found fit in medical examination and otherwise meritorious.

3. The facts of the instant case which arises are that on 05.09.2024, an advertisement was issued for recruitment to the post of Constable GD in the Central Armed/Police Forces (CAPFs) and SSF, Rifleman (GD) in the Assam Rifles and Sepoy in Narcotics Control Bureau Examination-2025. In the said advertisement, various dates have been mentioned. For the purpose of submission of the online application form, the window was from 05.09.2024 to 14.10.2024. It is also categorically mentioned that the last date and time for receipt of online application form is on 14.10.2024 on or before 11:00 PM.

4. The petitioners herein who admittedly belong to the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category applied in pursuance to the said advertisement for the posts of Constable GD. Clause 5 of the advertisement stipulated the age limit. The age of the candidates must be 18 to 23 years as of 01.01.2025, i.e. candidates born not before 02.01.2002 and not later than 01.01.2007. However, in respect to certain categories of candidates, the advertisement further prescribed age relaxation. In the case of SC or ST category, the age relaxation is five years and OBC is three years. Clause 6 of the advertisement stipulated the process of certification and the format of certificates. In terms with Clause 6.1, the candidates who wish to be considered against reserved vacancies or seek age relaxations are required to submit the requisite certificate from the Competent Authority in the prescribed format when such certificates are sought by the CAPFs concerned for document verification at the time of DME. It is further mentioned in the said Clause itself that if such requisite certificates are not produced, the claim of the candidates for SC/ST/OBC/EWS/ESM category would not be entertained and their candidature/application would be considered under the Unreserved Category. Further to that, the said Clause also mandated that if the candidate has sought any other age relaxation or claimed ESM status and is not able to produce the relevant certificate, he would be considered in his respective category, i.e. SC/ST/OBC/EWS/UR. The formats of the certificates have also been provided in the Notice dated 05.09.2024. The certificate for Other Backward Classes is at Annexure-VII to the Notice of Examination. The contents of the said certificate being relevant are reproduced hereunder:

Annexure-VII FORM OF CERTIFICATE TO BE PRODUCED BY OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES APPLYING FOR APPOINTMENT TO POSTS UNDER THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

This is to certify that Shri/ Smt./ Kumari _________________ son/ daughter of ________ of village/town __________________________________________ in District/Division___________________________ in the State/Union Territory _________ belongs to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top