THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH, KOHIMA BENCH
MANISH CHOUDHURY
Levi Sumi, New Colony, Zunheboto, Nagaland – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland, represented by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. Heard Mr. Taka Masa, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Arenlong, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. E. Thiba Phom, learned Government Advocate, Nagaland for the respondent nos. 1 – 4; and Mr. C.T. Jamir, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Albina Ozukum, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5.
2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the writ petitioner seeking the following reliefs :-
1. Quash and set aside, the impugned Order No. DC / KPE / JUD-64 [PT] 2011-12 / 214 dated 31.05.2024 [Annexure - V to the writ petition] issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Kiphire;
2. Quash and set aside / review / modify the impugned Notification No. NPSC/CON-35 / 2009 [Pt-1] dated 30.06.2020 issued by the Secretary, NPSC [Annexure - L to the writ petition] only with regard to Serial No. 37;
3. Direct the Deputy Commissioner, Kiphire to restore the Indigenous Certificate issued by the File No. DC / KPE / JUD-64 / 2017, Registration No. 1013 / 2017 dated 09.06.2017 and Schedule Tribe Certificate of the Petitioner issued by the File No. DC / KPE / JUD-64/2017, registration No. 113 / 2017 dated 09.06.

Kumari Madhuri Patil and another vs. Add. Commissioner, Tribal Development and others
Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta and others
Director General of Police, Railway Protection Force and others vs. Rajendra Kumar Dubey
Director of Tribal Welfare Government of A.P. vs. Laveti Giri and another
The court confirmed that the burden of proof for indigenous identity lies with the petitioner, reinforcing that DNA testing cannot be mandated without consent and administrative decisions must adhere....
The court emphasized the necessity for fair inquiry processes and the principle of inherited social status in inter-caste marriages, ruling that the petitioner was wrongly denied Scheduled Tribe stat....
Unilateral withdrawal of a recommendation for a Scheduled Tribe certificate without due process violates constitutional protections for Scheduled Tribes.
The court emphasized the importance of objective analysis and compliance with legal provisions and precedents in determining the validity of Scheduled Tribe claims.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that a person with a case based on falsehood has no right to approach the Court, and knowingly producing fabricated and fraudulent documents to ....
Caste claims must be evaluated with pre-constitutional documents holding greater evidential value, and reliance on affinity tests, which do not definitively establish caste ties, is insufficient for ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.