SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2289

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
E Kardak Ete, J.
Ashok Kr. Sen S/O. Lt. Adhik Ch. Sen And Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam Rep. By The Comm. And Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Deptt. Of HealthAnd Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 7239 of 2017, WP(C) 1910 of 2020, WP(C) 863 of 2020
Decided On : 27-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mrn J Das, Mr.A Choudhury, Mr.D Deka,Mr.N Mahajan,Mr.P K Das
For the Respondent: SC, Health

The right to health is a fundamental right under Article 21, warranting compensation for violations even without proving negligence by the State.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Writ petitions seeking compensation for loss of eyesight due to improper cataract surgeries at a government hospital. The court recognized the violations of fundamental rights to health and directed compensation irrespective of negligence findings. (Paras 11, 12, 14, 15)

(B) Public Law Remedy - The ruling affirms the entitlement to compensation under public law for contravention of fundamental rights, irrespective of the sovereign immunity of the State. (Para 13)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, from economically backward backgrounds, suffered severe complications after cataract surgeries at a government hospital, leading to loss of eyesight and the need for further surgeries. (Para 5)

Findings of Court:
The petitioners were awarded compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- each, acknowledging the inadequacies in hospital infrastructure despite no findings of negligence against the treating doctors. (Paras 14, 15)

Issues: The primary issue was the entitlements under Article 21 regarding health rights and appropriate compensation for loss suffered due to medical treatment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the constitutional guarantee of the right to health and the necessity of compensating individuals for fundamental rights violations caused by State action, highlighting previous legal precedents supporting public law remedies. (Paras 12, 13)

Result: Writ petitions disposed of with a directive for compensation payable within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. claim of negligence after cataract surgeries. (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
2. enquiry report on surgery complications. (Para 6 , 7)
3. compensation determination for affected patients. (Para 8 , 9)
4. state's acknowledgment and willingness to compensate. (Para 10 , 14)
5. fundamental right to health under article 21. (Para 12 , 13)
6. order for compensation payment timeline. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

KARDAK ETE, J.

Heard Mr. D. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. N. Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Assam and Mr. D. P. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Health and Family Welfare Department.

2. These writ petitions have been filed seeking monetary compensation to the petitioners alleging gross medical negligence by the treating doctors while undertaking the eye surgery at B. P. Civil Hospital, Nagaon (which is a government hospital under the State of Assam).

3. Having considered that the issue involved in these writ petitions is similar on facts and laws, same are taken up analogously and disposed of by this common judgment.

4. The petitioners, hailing from economically backward strata of the society, were suffering from the eye ailment and got themselves admitted in the B.P. Civil Hospital, Nagaon, a Government hospital under the State of Assam. The doctors in the B.P. Civil Hospital had undertaken cataract surgeries on the petitioners in WP(C) No. 7239/2017 on 07.03.2017 & 10.03.2017; petitioners in WP(C) No. 863/2020 on 08.02.2017, 08.03.2017, 08.03.2017 & 09.03.2017; and petitioner in WP(C) No. 1910/2020 on 09.03.2017, and were discharged on different dates, particularly on 08.03.2017, 11.03.2017; 10.03.2017, 09.03.2017, 09.03.2017; and 09.03.2017, & 10.03.2017, respectively.

5. It is the contention of the petitioners that after their cataract surgeries and discharge from B.P. Civil Hospital, they were confronted with severe irritation in their eyes upon which they were operated and were taken back to the said Civil Hospital by the friends and relatives. On examination by the treating doctor, it was informed that the cataract surgeries, which was undertaken, were improperly done. Accordingly, the petitioners were referred to Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati which they had to rush to Guwahati. On examination at Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya Hospital, it further came to light that the cataract operation, which was undertaken upon the petitioners by the doctors of B.P. Civil Hospital, was not properly conducted and to prevent further deterioration, it was advised that further surgery had to be conducted for removal of affected eye. Thereafter, the petitioners, on different dates, had undergone surgery at Sri Sankardeva Nethralaya Hospital for removal of the affected eyes. It is the contention of the petitioners that they had to lose their eyes without any fault on their part. Under the circumstances, the petitioners claim for monetary compensation under the public law remedy.

6. The Director of Health Services, Government of Assam, has placed the enquiry report conducted with regard to the incidence of post cataract surgery complications following cataract surgery of the petitioners at B.P. Civil Hospital, Nagaon pertaining to the period from 07.03.2017 to 11.03.2017 by way of an affidavit.

7. A perusal of the enquiry report indicates that out of the total 41 cases operated, 13 persons had developed complications and were ultimately treated at Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati. The findings indicates certain deficiency in the hospital so far as the eye operation theatre and therefore the enquiry committee recommended that eye operation theatre at B.P. Civil Hospital, Nagaon to remain closed till the microbiological clearance is available and fulfillment of the renovation and improvement of the eye operation theatre infrastructure etc.

8. The State respondents, vide communication dated 04.11.2025 by the Joint Secretary to the Government of Assam, Health & Family Welfare Depar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top