THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
Md. Baharul Islam, S/o. Late Sabur Uddin And Anr. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By Commissioner And Secy. And Ors. Respondent
WP(C) 5846 of 2021
Decided On : 10-02-2026
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
1. Heard Mr. K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.K. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. K.U. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 5, 6 and 7.
2. Challenge made in this petition is to the notification dated 04.02.2021 issued by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, whereby, the services of tutors against the Venture Lower Primary Schools and recognized Upper Primary Schools of 27 districts of Assam in accordance with the provisions of Assam Education (Provincialisation of Services of Teachers and Re-organization of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 (The Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017, in short) have been provincialized, particularly provincialisation of services of the respondents No.6 and 7 namely, Sheikh Hanif Uddin and Sunar Uddin in respect of N.C. Kachumara M.E. Madrassa in the district of Barpeta.
3. The petitioners were appointed as Arabic and Hindi Teachers on 03.01.1988 and 28.03.1993 by the Managing Committee of N.C. Kachumara M.E. Madrassa in the district of Barpeta. The name of the petitioners and the respondent No.6 appeared in DISE Code of 2009-10 in the list of teaching staffs of the said M.E. Madrassa. However, the name of the respondents No.7 did not appear and does not have the DISE Code of 2009-10.
4. Pursuant to the Govt. Letter dated 30.01.2021 and in accordance with the provisions of the Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017, altogether 3309 tutors of Venture Lower Primary Schools and 6586 tutors of Recognized Upper Primary Schools of 27 districts of Assam was notified district wise with the name of the tutors whose services were eligible for provincialislation as per the Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017 by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam. In the notification, the name of the respondent No.6 appeared in SL No. 204 for provincialisation as tutors of N.C. Kachumara M.E. Madrassa and the name of respondent No.7 appeared at Serial No. 203 and accordingly, the services of the respondents No.6 and 7 have been provincialised as tutors of the said N.C. Kachumara M.E. Madrassa.
5. It is the contention of the petitioners that they having been appointed on 03.01.1988 and 21.03.1993 as language teachers in the N.C. Kachumara M.E. Madrassa and the respondent No.6 having been appointed in the year 2006 and the respondent No.7 although appears to have been appointed on 01.03.2010, are much junior to the petitioners, therefore, both the respondents No. 6 and 7 ought not to have been considered for provincialisation as the seniority of the petitioners has been totally ignored and no consideration was made by the respondent authorities in terms of the provision of the Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017 as for additional teachers/tutors, the DISE Code of the teachers are mandatory and, the seniority position cannot be ignored.
6. Mr. K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners while referring to the list of details of the teaching staff, submits that altogether there are six teachers including the respondent No.6. From SL No. 1 to 3, have been provincialised in terms of the provisions of the Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017 as tutors for Science and Mathematics, Social studies and Language subjects. In terms of the proviso to Section 3 (1)(xi) of the Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017, for additional post, it is to be considered in accordance with the norms and standard stipulated under Section 19 and 25 of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. He submits that as a rightful and fair consideration, the petitioners case ought to have been considered and recommended for provincialisation for the additional post of tutors as the petitioners are much senior to the respondents No. 6 and 7, as the petitioners having been appointed in the year 1988 and 1993 and the respondents No. 6 and 7 being appointed in 2006 and 2010. Moreover, the name
Provincialisation of teaching staff must adhere to seniority and proper qualification criteria as mandated by the Assam Provincialisation Act, 2017.
A senior language teacher has the primary claim for provincialisation under the Assam Education Act, and failure to provide justifiable reasons for excluding such a claim is arbitrary.
The Court established that seniority for provincialization of teachers' services must be determined based on accurate service records as per the Assam Education Act, 2017.
Point of Law : Section 19 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, no school shall be established, or recognized, under Section 18 unless it fulfils the norms and standard....
The omission of a qualified teacher from the provincialization list is arbitrary and violates statutory provisions and principles of natural justice.
Provincialisation of service under the Act allows for individuals to be designated as Tutors without holding a degree, requiring them to acquire necessary qualifications within five years for upgrade....
The court established that eligibility for provincialization of teachers' services must be based on verified service records and seniority, as per the provisions of the relevant Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.