JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

1. Heard Mr. R.A. Mazumder, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. R. Dhar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 5.

2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the impugned Minutes dated 11.02.2022 and the extended sitting held on 16.03.2022 whereby the District Level Committee rejected the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground.

3. This Court has duly perused Minutes of the District Level Committee Meeting for appointment on compassionate basis held on 11.02.2022 and 16.03.2022 which is impugned in the instant proceedings and the reason why the petitioner's application was rejected was that the petitioner's father had less than three years balance service at the time of his death which is in terms with paragraph No.1 of the Office Memorandum dated 01.06.2015.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that this Court vide the judgment and order dated 30.01.2023 passed in WP(C) No.1646/2021 struck down the Clause 1 of the Office Memorandum dated 01.06.2015. The learned counsel further submitted that the said judgment was challenged before the learned Divis