Back
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Jitu Tapan Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with a claim for appointment on compassionate ground.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell is that his father, Lalit Chandra Das, who was working as Grade-IV in the Raidongia H. Saikia H.S. School in the district of Nagaon had died in harness on 26.01.2012. The petitioner who claims to be eligible had applied for appointment on compassionate ground and the District Level Committee (DLC) vide meeting held on 09.08.2012 had recommended the case of the petitioner. In the said meeting however, the candidature of the respondent no. 8 was rejected. It is the case of the petitioner that the DLC had another meeting on 23.04.2013 in which however, the claim of the petitioner was rejected while that of the respondent no. 8 was recommended. Be that as it may, it appears that both the minutes were taken into consideration by the State Level Committee (SLC) on 26.08.2014 in which the case of the respondent no. 8 was recommended.
3. Being aggrieved, the present writ petition was instituted. It may however be m
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as the sense of urgency is lost.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and must be pursued promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency and relevance of the application.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment procedures and must be made promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays undermine this objective.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly; significant delays dilute the urgency of financial need.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and is meant to address immediate financial crises. The sense of immediacy is diluted and lost in cases of prolonged delay, and compassionate appointme....
Compassionate appointments must be sought immediately after the death of a government employee, as delays negate the intended relief purpose.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointment claims must be pursued without undue delay, as significant lags undermine the objective of immediate relief for bereaved families.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
