SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 137

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Anjan Moni Kalita, J.
Kaushik Das, Son Of Late Bhupen Das – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Pp – Respondent
AB 163 of 2026
Decided On : 24-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D Das Sr. Adv, S I Ahmed, Mr P Talukdar,Mr W R Medhi, Mr A V Singh
For the Respondent: PP, Assam, Ms. P Kashyap, P Bhowmick, N.R. Sharma, Mr A Sharma, Mr. A Khound, Ms. N Choudhury, Mr. A K Bhuyan

A consensual relationship that ends unfavorably cannot be criminalized; the burden lies on proving coercion and lack of consent for allegations of sexual exploitation.

Headnote:(A) BNS, 2023 - Sections 318(2), 64, 69, 89, 351(2) - Pre-arrest bail application - Allegations of sexual exploitation under false promise of marriage - The relationship commenced in March 2020; a written declaration promising marriage was made on 13th September 2020 - Accused-applicant claimed relationship was consensual; court found no coercion involved - Interim bail granted based on cooperation with investigation and absence of sufficient coercive elements. (Paras 2, 6, 11, 15)

(B) Criminal Law - Nature of Consent - Court ruled that mere breakup of a consensual relationship cannot constitute criminality; sexual exploitation claims must demonstrate actual absence of free consent, not mere disappointment after promises - The court emphasized the gravity and seriousness of charges such as rape, reinforcing the principle that failed relationships should not be criminalized lightly. (Paras 13, 14)

Facts of the case:
The Informant alleged that the accused-applicant promised to marry her, engaged in a relationship with her, and subsequently, under threats and coercion, she underwent abortion after becoming pregnant; however, the accused denied exploiting her claims. The court noted the duration of the relationship and established their emotional conflicts as typical in long-term relationships.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the relationship did not involve coercion and that both parties willingly engaged in the relationship which was publicly acknowledged.

Issues: The key questions were whether there was a false promise of marriage and whether the Informant's consent was vitiated by coercion.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Informant's claims did not display any coercive elements regarding consent, affirming that the relationship had consent established through emotional commitment over time. The interim bail was to remain effective as there were no grounds for custodial detention at this stage.

Result: Anticipatory bail application allowed as the interim order was made absolute.

Table of Content
1. application for pre-arrest bail filed. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. contentions regarding consent and relationship dynamics. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's analysis of relationship and consent. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. validation of consensual relationships from legal precedents. (Para 13 , 14)
5. interim bail order made absolute. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

Anjan Moni Kalita, J.

Heard Mr. D. Das, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A. V. Singh, learned counsel for the accused-applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, representing the State respondent as well as Ms. N. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2.

2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, by the accused- applicant, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Rangiya Police Station Case No. 19/2026, registered under Sections 318(2)/64/69/89/351(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. An FIR was lodged on 22.01.2026, by one Dr. Jeshie Kalita, alleging, inter alia, that one Mr. Kaushik Das (accused-applicant) and she got involved in a love relationship since the month of March, 2020 and from the very inception of relationship, the accused-applicant has been repeatedly promising to marry her by portraying her as his future wife; that in furtherance of such promise, the accused-applicant proposed her with an engagement ring in the month of February, 2021, which was known to the friends and family members of both of them; that the accused-applicant had taken her with him to Delhi when his father was undergoing some medical treatment at Medanta Hospital, Delhi; that during that period, the Informant stayed with him and his family members to take care of his ailing father; that she had gone to Delhi again in the last week of March, 2024 for medical treatment of the father of the accused-applicant; that however, subsequently, on 10th May, 2024, the father of the accused-applicant expired in Delhi and she accompanied the accused-applicant’s mother and sister from their house in Delhi to his native place in Rangiya; that the accused-applicant repeatedly assured her that he would marry her in front of his family members thereby, gained her complete thrust and emotional dependence; that the accused-applicant has executed a written declaration on a stamp paper dated 13th September, 2020 wherein he clearly promised to marry her; that due to such promises, the Informant consented to physical relationship with him, however, shockingly, it later became apparent that the promise of marriage was false, dishonest and made solely for the purpose of sexually exploiting her vitiating her consent; that the Informant got pregnant on or around 10th July, 2024 but when she informed the accused-applicant and his family members about the pregnancy, instead of taking care of her, they subjected her to threats, pressure and emotional coercion to terminate the pregnancy against her wishes; that after abortion, the accused-applicant refused to marry her and he and his family members started avoiding her and started abusing and humiliating her verbally and blamed her solely for the pregnancy and the subsequent abortion; that due such happenings in her life, she could not take the NEET examination in the year 2025; that the intention of the accused-applicant was dishonest from the very beginning as he got into the relationship solely on false promise of marriage and only for his own sexual gratification; that in fact, she wanted to take the extreme step of committing suicide in couple of occasions, however, despite of knowledge of such attempts, the accused-applicant and his family members deliberately continued to avoid her and, in fact, abused her which has become unbearable for her. The Informant contended that due to such treatment and exploitation of her sexually on false promise of marriage by the Accused Applicant, the Informant has filed the instant FIR.

4. On receipt of the FIR, the police registered Rangiya Police Station Case No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top