SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 154

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Anjan Moni Kalita, J.
Abdul Kalam, S/O Aptab Uddin – Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India Rep. By Sc, Ncb, Guwahati Zone – Respondent
Bail Appln. 4113 of 2025
Decided On : 24-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A K Talukdar, M Rahoman, Mr Shahin Yusuf
For the Respondent: SC, NCB

Compliance with arrest procedures under BNSS is crucial; failure to follow may infringe rights but was upheld here based on proper execution.

Headnote:(A) BNSS, 2023 - Sections 36 and 48 - NDPS Act, 1985 - Bail application - Accused arrested under NDPS Act allegations of trafficking methamphetamine - Court examined compliance of arrest procedures and rights under Article 22(1) - Found no violation of statutory provisions and upheld the arrest's legality. (Paras 6, 10, 12)

(B) Legal procedures - Compliance with arrest provisions - The execution of the arrest and notices under BNSS was found proper, leading to the conclusion that rights of the accused were not infringed. (Paras 6, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, Abdul Kalam, was arrested on July 14, 2025, in connection with drug trafficking, based on confessional statements of co-accused and operative evidence, while he claimed he had no knowledge of trafficking. (Paras 5, 6)

Findings of Court:
The court found that arrest procedures were followed, the accused was properly informed, and the evidence against the applicant was considered prima facie sufficient to deny bail. (Paras 10, 12)

Issues: The court addressed issues about potential violations of arrest rights and the evidentiary basis for the bail application. (Paras 6, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that compliance with statutory procedures in the arrest was sufficiently met, reaffirming that the weight of statements from co-accused had enough probative value to dismiss bail pleas. (Paras 10, 12)

Result: Bail application rejected.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the arrest (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments for and against bail application (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's analysis of arrest procedures (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. bail application deemed without merit (Para 12)
5. conclusion on bail application (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

Anjan Moni Kalita, J.

Heard A. K. Talukdar, learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant and Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for NCB.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for granting bail to the accused applicant namely, Abdul Kalam, who was arrested on 14.07.2025, in connection with NCB Guwahati Zonal Unit, Crime No. 09/2025 under Section 8(c) read with Sections 22(c)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

3. The gist of the prosecution’s case is that on 13.07.2025 at about 17:00 hours, Shri Pankaj Kumar Chouhan, Inspector, NCB, Guwahati, received a secret information that between 23:00 hours of 13.07.2025 and 02:00 hours of 14.07.2025, three persons, namely (1) Md. Murad, (2) Sayed Musa, and (3) Md. Yakub Ali, all residents of Sangaiyumpham under P.S. Thoubal, Manipur, would be trafficking approximately 10 kgs. of Methamphetamine tablets in a Mahindra XUV bearing registration No. AS 01 EX 5075 coming from Jagiroad side towards Guwahati. Pursuant thereto, on 14.07.2025, the NCB team intercepted the said vehicle at Nazirakhat Toll Plaza and apprehended the aforesaid three persons. It was alleged that, upon interrogation, the said persons admitted to trafficking Methamphetamine tablets concealed in specially fabricated cavities of the vehicle. However, unable to locate exact place of hiding the aforesaid contraband tablets in the vehicle, the vehicle was taken to a nearby workshop in the VIP Road, namely, Khushi Motor Works. Thereafter, at about 1:30 AM, the NCB team conducted a further search in the vehicle with the help of the mechanics and recovered 50 packets of Methamphetamine tablets weighing 10.858 kg from concealed cavities in the chassis of the vehicle. Consequently, NCB, GZU Crime No. 09/2025 was registered.

4. On the basis of the aforesaid seizure, an investigation was initiated by the NCB, Guwahati Zonal Unit, in Crime No. 09/2025 and the three aforementioned persons were taken into custody. Subsequently, the present accused applicant was also arrested on 14.07.2025 and has since been languishing in judicial custody in connection with the said case. Formal Complaint in the case was submitted before the learned Sessions (SPL) Judge, Kamrup (Metro) and the same is registered as NDPS Case No. 12 of 2026.

5. Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel for the accused applicant, submits that the accused applicant had been staying at a hotel since 13.07.2025 when he received a phone call from NCB officials asking him to appear before the NCB office. In compliance, he appeared and was arrested. He contends that the implication of the accused applicant is solely based on the disclosure statements of co-accused persons and a statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, which have weak evidentiary value in view of the law laid down in Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu , reported in (2021) 4 SCC 1 . Learned counsel further submits that the accused applicant had come to Guwahati for medical purposes and for personal work relating to the purchase of a laptop and tools for his son’s proposed business, and had agreed to accompany co-accused Yakub Ali for his medical consultation as Yakub Ali told him that he did not know Assamese. He submitted that the Accused Applicant knew Yakub Ali as he is from his Father-in-law’s village. He submits that the Accused Applicant had no knowledge of any alleged trafficking. It is also contended that no documentary evidence of any alleged monetary transaction has been produced against him.

6. Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel, submits that the accused applicant has a limited educational background and does not properly understand Hindi or English; yet his sign

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top